Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re^9: Use perl type without perl

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Sep 25, 2012 at 19:10 UTC ( #995620=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^8: Use perl type without perl
in thread Use perl type without perl

Passing my_perl on the stack/register is alot faster than the GLR and SLR and TlsGetValue calls.

Ignoring that I don't know what "GLR and SLR" are -- and you do not bother to explain them -- I'd be interested to see proof of that "much faster". Faster I have no doubts, but much faster?

See "TlsGetValue was implemented with speed as the primary goal."

And I counter that assertion with: speed isn't everything.

Burdening every function, and every programmer, with the need to accommodate a 'pass-through variable' and relying upon the optimiser to make it disappear when not required -- all to save what effectively becomes something like mov rax, GS:[8*rcx+0x2c] -- is short-sighted in the extreme.

And wrapping it over in a bunch of "trick" macros make the programmer burden -- via cognitive disconnection -- even worse.

I took the OP to mean...

How would you handle ...

I wouldn't. Just because I took the OP to mean that; doesn't mean that I think that it is a good idea, or even possible.

I only attempted to answer -- at perhaps a superficial level -- the OPs question: "I'm curious why non-threaded perl can do what thread perl can't do.". Naught more.

Which is why I think your post would have been better directed at the alternative you suggested.

GObject and Perl's GC systems have many similarities. ... I am saying that would be a bad choice.

Then why mention it? No one else did.

Aren't you just as guilty of misdirection by bringing it up and leaving it hanging as the guy that suggested: "you'll be fine so long as you don't use threads"? Which seems to be the focus of your posts.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

RIP Neil Armstrong


Comment on Re^9: Use perl type without perl
Download Code
Re^10: Use perl type without perl
by bulk88 (Priest) on Sep 25, 2012 at 23:23 UTC

    Ignoring that I don't know what "GLR and SLR" are -- and you do not bother to explain them -- I'd be interested to see proof of that "much faster". Faster I have no doubts, but much faster?

    See "TlsGetValue was implemented with speed as the primary goal."

    And I counter that assertion with: speed isn't everything.

    My new motto, death by a thousand cuts.

    Win XP TlsGetValue has 3 branches in asm. 1 branch on the found value path. On found value path, other than mandatory stack frame maintenance, deref FS Register, deref c stack index val, cmp index val to const, cond jump, and TEB in regular register + offset with const 0 (setlasterror = 0), move TEB in regular register+index reg+ SIB encoded constant to eax, return. A total of 11 machine opcodes executed, stack frame maintenance included. That is also ignoring the SetLastError and GetLastError done by Perl before and after TlsGetValue. Now time for some real world numbers.
    void CxtSpeed() PREINIT: LARGE_INTEGER start; LARGE_INTEGER end; int i; PPCODE: QueryPerformanceCounter(&start); for(i=0; i < 1000000000; i++){ no_cxt(); } QueryPerformanceCounter(&end); printf("no cxt %I64u\n", end.QuadPart-start.QuadPart); QueryPerformanceCounter(&start); for(i=0; i < 1000000000; i++){ cxt(aTHX); } QueryPerformanceCounter(&end); printf("cxt %I64u\n", end.QuadPart-start.QuadPart);
    //separate compiland/obj file #define PERL_NO_GET_CONTEXT #include <EXTERN.h> #include <perl.h> #include <XSUB.h> __declspec(dllexport) int no_cxt(){ dTHX; return ((int) my_perl) >> 1; } __declspec(dllexport) int cxt(pTHX){ return ((int) my_perl) >> 1; }
    #in makefile.pl hash to WriteMakefile FUNCLIST => ['no_cxt', 'cxt'], dynamic_lib => { OTHERLDFLAGS => ' noopt.obj ' , INST_DYNAMIC_DEP => 'noopt.obj' },
    Make sure to check disassembly to make it wasn't all inline optimized away. cxt() loop was completely removed in my 1st try.
    C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\Desktop\cpan libs\lxs>perl -MLocal::XS + -e "Local:: XS::CxtSpeed();" no cxt 48160819 cxt 11096124 C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\Desktop\cpan libs\lxs>
    Whole script took about 5-8 seconds. 1 Perl_get_context took 4.3 times more time than passing it on the C stack and of course everything tested fit L1 the whole time. I would much rather have my_perl on the C stack or in a register (compiler's choice) than call Perl_get_context half a dozen or more times in every Perl C function. If you want to know why TlsGetValue is never optimized away to inline assembly, ask MS. I didn't write Kernel32.

    I'm surprised it only took 4 times longer. GetLastError is 3 opcodes, stack frame maintenance included. SetLastError is 8 opcode, stack frame maintenance included. TlsGetValue was 11 opcodes, stack frame maintenance included. Perl_get_context is 13 opcodes, no branches, stack frame maintenance included. 3 opcodes for no_cxt, stack frame maintenance included. Total of 38 opcodes for no_cxt. A total of 3 opcodes for cxt(), stack frame maintenance included. So, no_cxt took 12.6 times more opcodes than cxt, yet only 4.3 times more time. Did my superscalar Core 2 eliminate all those function calls to one function call with IPO when it recompiled x86 asm to microop asm or branch predictor + cache dirty flag checking removed the code? IDK, but interesting numbers anyway. In any case my_perl in a register/c stack wins.

    Which is why I think your post would have been better directed at the alternative you suggested.

    Should I delete my post and post it to the other post?
    GObject and Perl's GC systems have many similarities. ... I am saying that would be a bad choice.

    Then why mention it? No one else did.

    The OP was vague and didn't concisely explain anything, so I had to consult with my crystal ball that I got at the pound shop made from lead wiring, chip board and bitumen, to read the OP's mind. My crystal ball said he is using Perl in a DLL that doesn't link with Perl but includes Perl's headers for Perl's GC. Should I use my O'Reilly brand tarot cards in the future?

    Aren't you just as guilty of misdirection by bringing it up and leaving it hanging as the guy that suggested: "you'll be fine so long as you don't use threads"? Which seems to be the focus of your posts.

    I gave an answer
    Someone who didn't read the manual will think they can use Perl C data structures without a "useless" Perl around instead of GObject
    If you read the manual (perlapi/perlguts/illguts/perlembed/perlxs), you will know that using Perl without an initialized interp is not supported by Perl.

      Separating the useful from the non-useful. I reply to the first part of your post separately.

      Should I delete my post and post it to the other post?

      No. But had you aimed more carefully, you might be righting the wrong you perceived, byt discussing it with the guy that perpetrated it, rather than having this (pointless part of this) discussion with me.

      The OP was vague and didn't concisely explain anything, ...

      So, to correct wrong of bad information -- that someone else posted -- you supplied some equally bad information, in reply to me?

      Let's call this part of the discussion a misunderstanding and close it.


      With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

      RIP Neil Armstrong

      First, thank you for arguing with numbers. It is a rare event and most welcomed.

      But --- you knew that was coming right -- your benchmark:

      1. Has to use a huge multiplier -- 1 billion iterations -- to make a mountain out of a molehill.

        Let's say the total runtime was the upper of your vague estimate. 8 seconds.

        Which means:

        'cxt' took 1.5 seconds for 1e9 operations = 0.0000000015 s/iteration.
        'noctx' took 6.5 seconds for 1e9 operations = 0.0000000065 s/iteration.

        By any body's standards, a whole 5 billionths of a second difference is hardly "huge". (Which was your assertion).

        And if the body of the loop did anything useful -- like call one or two of the huge macros or long twisty functions that are the reason for having the context within the sub in the first place --then those 5 nanoseconds would just disappear into the noise.

      2. In the noctx, you are using the equally flawed Perl_get_context()

        Which, as you point out, entirely swamps the call to TLSGetValue(), by bracketing it with (useless*) calls to GetLastError() and SetLastError().

        As we discussed before, what Last error are they preserving, that is important enough to be preserved, not important enough to be reported straight away?

        And, if there is justification for preserving some system errors whilst ignoring other, why preserve them in OS memory thus requiring every unimportant system call to be bracketed with GLE/SLE? Why not get the error just after the important system call that caused it and put it somewhere local?

        That way, you do one GetLastError() call after each (significant) system call that you want to preserve; rather than bracketing every insignificant system call with two other system calls.

        My prime suspect for why TLSGetValue() doesn't get inlined, is the fact that it is bracketed by those other two calls. I'd love to see you add a 3rd test to your benchmark that calls TLSGetValue() directly. I'm not saying it will be inlined, but even if it isn't, it would reduce the (already nanoscopic) difference quite considerably.

      3. Most significantly -- you've tested something quite different to that I was trying to describe.

        The reason functions need to have visibility of the context, is because some of the functions they call, require it be passed to them.

        This requirement is often hidden by wrapping the functions that need it in macros. You know better than I do how grossly unwieldy many of the wrapper macros get.

        There is a common pattern to many of the worst ones, that goes something like this:

        #define SOMETHING1 STMT_START { assert( something ); if(some_complex_c +ondition) wrapped_function1( aTHX_, ... ); assert(something_else ) } +STMT_END #define SOMETHING2 STMT_START { assert( something ); if(some_complex_c +ondition) wrapped_function2( aTHX_, ... ); assert(something_else ) } +STMT_END #define SOMETHING3 STMT_START { assert( something ); if(some_complex_c +ondition) wrapped_function3( aTHX_, ... ); assert(something_else ) } +STMT_END int someFunction( aTHX_ ... ) { dATHX; ...; SOMETHING1( ... ); ...; SOMETHING2( ... ); ...; SOMETHING3( ... ); RETURN; }

        The logic being (I assume) that by testing the conditions inline, you prevent the call overhead for the cases where the condition(s) fail.

        But a simple test shows that it isn't the case:

        With x1(), 50% of calls are avoided by an inline conditional test.

        With x2(), that test is moved into the body of the function, which returns immediately if the test fails.

        Compile & run:

        C:\test>cl /Ox calloverhead.c Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 15.00.21022.08 for x64 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. calloverhead.c Microsoft (R) Incremental Linker Version 9.00.21022.08 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. /out:calloverhead.exe calloverhead.obj C:\test>calloverhead 10000000 Inline condition: 60,068,106 Inbody condition: 45,064,458 C:\test>calloverhead 10000000 Inline condition: 60,037,515 Inbody condition: 45,084,879 C:\test>calloverhead 10000000 Inline condition: 60,048,828 Inbody condition: 45,057,681 C:\test>calloverhead 10000000 Inline condition: 60,032,691 Inbody condition: 45,032,724

        The inline condition takes 1/3rd more cycles than putting the test inside the body of the function call!

        And if the conditional tests are inside the body of the functions, you no longer need the macro wrappers -- which makes things a lot clearer for the programmer.

        And you also don't need access to the context in all the callers of the wrapped functions, so then the called function can obtain the context internally, thus removing it from visibility at the caller's level.

        And the code size shrinks because the conditional test appears once inside the function rather than at every call site.

        That's a 3 way win, with no downsides.

      The point is that you cannot take one single aspect of the overall vision, mock it up into a highly artificial benchmark and draw conclusions. You have to consider the entire picture.

      Of course, it is never going to happen, so there is little point in arguing about it; but if you did effect this kind of change throughout the code base; along with all the other stuff we discussed elsewhere; the effects can be significant.

      The hope for using LLVM to compile the Perl runtime, is that by re-writing the macro-infested C sources to IR, and combining them with current compilation unit of Perl code that uses it -- also suitably compiled to IR; it can see through both the macros and the disjoint runloop, and find optimisations on a case-by-case basis that cannot be made universally.

      That is to say, (by way of example), a piece of code that uses no magic, and only IVs or UVs, may qualify for optimisations that could not be made statically by a C compiler, because -- given the current structure of the pp_* opcode functions -- it could never possibly see them; as it always has to allow for the possibility of magic; and NVs; and PVs; et al.


      With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

      RIP Neil Armstrong

        Has to use a huge multiplier -- 1 billion iterations -- to make a mountain out of a molehill.

        Let's say the total runtime was the upper of your vague estimate. 8 seconds.

        Which means:

        'cxt' took 1.5 seconds for 1e9 operations = 0.0000000015 s/iteration.
        'noctx' took 6.5 seconds for 1e9 operations = 0.0000000065 s/iteration.

        By any body's standards, a whole 5 billionths of a second difference is hardly "huge". (Which was your assertion).

        Irrelevant. Would you recommend to eliminate SSE1-4 since the difference is only a billionth of a second between a x87 and SSE* operation? As an infamous monk on PM likes to say, cpu usage is irrelevant because you did I/O. Not true, a modern PC is not running MSDOS. If my CPU is loaded to 100% (getting your moneys worth from hardware) I absolutely would like the process, any process, to compete its work in less cycles. Every cycle saved means a free cycle for the next process to run in, or less energy usage, either for battery or power bill, since the CPU was sent into a low power state by the kernel until the next interrupt, the few times I've played with the kernel debugger, 100% of breaks landed in MS NT Kernel's http://doxygen.reactos.org/d7/d08/arm_2thrdini_8c_source.html#l00153, which is a good thing.
        In the noctx, you are using the equally flawed Perl_get_context()

        Which, as you point out, entirely swamps the call to TLSGetValue(), by bracketing it with (useless*) calls to GetLastError() and SetLastError().

        As we discussed before, what Last error are they preserving, that is important enough to be preserved, not important enough to be reported straight away?

        And, if there is justification for preserving some system errors whilst ignoring other, why preserve them in OS memory thus requiring every unimportant system call to be bracketed with GLE/SLE? Why not get the error just after the important system call that caused it and put it somewhere local?

        That way, you do one GetLastError() call after each (significant) system call that you want to preserve; rather than bracketing every insignificant system call with two other system calls.

        Win32 Perl's architecture emulates various parts of POSIX in win32.c or in MS's CRT, this layer is less than ideally designed, its actually crap IMO. A design choice was made to use, probably due to budget reasons, (dPERLOBJ = dTHX today), to not change the function signatures, and not to pass my_perl but use dTHX instead, (one of of many commits that adds dTHX everywhere http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/blobdiff/4f4e629e089f1120f8e94984281df06ac4f885c5..0cb9638729211ea71a75ae8756c03ba21553bd53:/win32/win32.c ) Originally dTHX was what you wanted, was a plain macro to TlsGetValue, (see http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/blob/ea0efc06fdad2019ffceb86d079dd853e9d79cea:/win32/win32thread.h#l81), but soon after in http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commit/ba869debd80c55cfae8e9d4de0991d62f9efcb9b?f=win32/win32thread.c LastError was added with no explanation or code comments. You can try asking Jan Dubois about the LastError saving or should I start a Kickstarter project to hiring a medium for Perl? (not fair, Gurusamy isn't dead just retired). IDK if Jan would be able to answer the question using internal records at AS, I couldn't find anything on http://bugs.activestate.com/.

        My prime suspect for why TLSGetValue() doesn't get inlined, is the fact that it is bracketed by those other two calls. I'd love to see you add a 3rd test to your benchmark that calls TLSGetValue() directly. I'm not saying it will be inlined, but even if it isn't, it would reduce the (already nanoscopic) difference quite considerably.

        The most likely reason that TLSGetValue is not inlined is it would break ABI between releases of Windows. TLS lives in the TEB struct, an undocumented struct. It is different between DOS Windows and NT kernel, and probably different between different versions of the NT kernel. On the topic of Win32 API calls that should be inlined but are not, InterlockedCompareExchange started being inlined in VS 2005 or VS 2008 (saw it personally in VS 2008). My VS 2003 does not inline InterlockedCompareExchange and calls to Kernel32 always. Per google, x86 cmpxchg was added in the 486. Windows 95/98 were designed with 386 compatibility, in WinME, disassembly shows InterlockedCompareExchange is a kernel call with a system service table number. I'll guess and say it is NOT implemented with lock cmpxchg. Some trivia, SHInterlockedCompareExchange, new in shlwapi v5 (from IE 5) is implemented as lock cmpxchg, I think this shlwapi v5 was intended to run on NT and DOS Win but on 486 and newer. There is also a Win16 IE 5, but I dont have time to RE it. Perhaps in Win16 you dont even need InterlockedCompareExchange at all since all context switches are 100% voluntary and there are no threads.

        I've only written about the 1st 1/2 of your post. I'll analyze the last half of your post and update this post soon with your C code and a no last error TlsGetValue test.

        By any body's standards, a whole 5 billionths of a second difference is hardly "huge". (Which was your assertion).

        And if the body of the loop did anything useful -- like call one or two of the huge macros or long twisty functions that are the reason for having the context within the sub in the first place --then those 5 nanoseconds would just disappear into the noise.

        The 5 nanoseconds can not disappear into the noise. They are not free. If they ran, they cost time. Whether it is 1 ns vs 5 ns, or 1 ms vs 5 ms, or 1 minute vs 5 minutes, the smaller choice is better. Lets see how many times Perl_get_context is called for the simplest of Perl programs. PGC=Perl_get_context.
        C:\p517\perl\win32>perl -e "for(0..5) {print 'hello world'.\"\n\";};" hello world hello world hello world hello world hello world hello world PGC count 1096 C:\p517\perl\win32>perl -e "print 'hello world'"; hello worldPGC count 1069 C:\p517\perl\win32>perl -e "system('pause');" Press any key to continue . . . PGC count 1133 C:\p517\perl\win32>
        Now lets try to compile an XS module.
        C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\Desktop\cpan libs\Win32API\g>perl make +file.pl Checking if your kit is complete... Warning: the following files are missing in your kit: api-test/Release/API_test.dll api-test/Release/API_test.lib Please inform the author. Writing Makefile for Win32::API::Callback Writing MYMETA.yml and MYMETA.json Writing Makefile for Win32::API Writing MYMETA.yml and MYMETA.json PGC count 337157 C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\Desktop\cpan libs\Win32API\g>nmake ins +tall Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 7.10.3077 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. PGC count 29225 PGC count 29077 PGC count 29098 PGC count 29131 PGC count 29077 PGC count 29098 PGC count 29228 PGC count 29077 PGC count 29098 PGC count 29229 PGC count 29077 PGC count 29098 PGC count 29131 PGC count 29077 PGC count 29098 PGC count 29131 PGC count 29077 PGC count 29098 PGC count 29131 PGC count 29077 PGC count 29098 PGC count 29131 PGC count 29077 PGC count 29098 cp Type.pm blib\lib\Win32/API/Type.pm cp Callback.pm blib\lib\Win32/API/Callback.pm cp Test.pm blib\lib\Win32/API/Test.pm cp Struct.pm blib\lib\Win32/API/Struct.pm cp API.pm blib\lib\Win32/API.pm cp IATPatch.pod blib\lib\Win32/API/Callback/IATPatch.pod PGC count 135573 PGC count 29098 nmake -f Makefile all -nologo PGC count 29084 PGC count 29077 PGC count 29098 PGC count 29132 PGC count 29077 PGC count 29098 PGC count 29132 PGC count 29077 PGC count 29098 PGC count 29098 C:\perl517\bin\perl.exe C:\perl517\lib\ExtUtils\xsubpp -typem +ap C:\perl 517\lib\ExtUtils\typemap Callback.xs > Callback.xsc && C:\perl517\bin +\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Command -e mv -- Callback.xsc Callback.c PGC count 153957 PGC count 29098 cl -c -nologo -GF -W3 -MD -Zi -DNDEBUG -O1 -G7 -DWIN32 -D_C +ONSOLE -DN O_STRICT -DPERL_TEXTMODE_SCRIPTS -DPERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT -DPERL_IMPLIC +IT_SYS -DU SE_PERLIO -D_USE_32BIT_TIME_T -MD -Zi -DNDEBUG -O1 -G7 -DVERSION=\" +0.71\" -D XS_VERSION=\"0.71\" "-IC:\perl517\lib\CORE" Callback.c Callback.c Running Mkbootstrap for Win32::API::Callback () PGC count 1097 PGC count 11211 PGC count 29098 C:\perl517\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Command -e chmod -- 644 Ca +llback.bs PGC count 29077 C:\perl517\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Mksymlists -e "Mksymlists +('NAME'=>\ "Win32::API::Callback\", 'DLBASE' => 'Callback', 'DL_FUNCS' => { }, ' +FUNCLIST' => [], 'IMPORTS' => { }, 'DL_VARS' => []);" PGC count 13035 link -out:..\blib\arch\auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.dll -d +ll -nologo -nodefaultlib -debug -opt:ref,icf -libpath:"c:\perl517\lib\CORE" -m +achine:x86 Callback.obj C:\perl517\lib\CORE\perl517.lib oldnames.lib kernel32. +lib user32 .lib gdi32.lib winspool.lib comdlg32.lib advapi32.lib shell32.lib ole +32.lib ole aut32.lib netapi32.lib uuid.lib ws2_32.lib mpr.lib winmm.lib version +.lib odbc3 2.lib odbccp32.lib comctl32.lib msvcrt.lib -def:Callback.def Creating library ..\blib\arch\auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.lib +and object ..\blib\arch\auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.exp if exist ..\blib\arch\auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.dll.man +ifest mt - nologo -manifest ..\blib\arch\auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.dll.man +ifest -out putresource:..\blib\arch\auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.dll;2 if exist ..\blib\arch\auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.dll.man +ifest del ..\blib\arch\auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.dll.manifest C:\perl517\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Command -e chmod -- 755 .. +\blib\arch \auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.dll PGC count 29077 PGC count 35327 C:\perl517\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Command -e cp -- Callback. +bs ..\blib \arch\auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.bs PGC count 37097 C:\perl517\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Command -e chmod -- 644 .. +\blib\arch \auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.bs PGC count 29077 cd .. C:\perl517\bin\perl.exe C:\perl517\lib\ExtUtils\xsubpp -nolin +enumbers -typemap C:\perl517\lib\ExtUtils\typemap -typemap typemap API.xs > AP +I.xsc && C :\perl517\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Command -e mv -- API.xsc API.c PGC count 156717 PGC count 29098 cl -c -nologo -GF -W3 -MD -Zi -DNDEBUG -O1 -G7 -DWIN32 -D_C +ONSOLE -DN O_STRICT -DPERL_TEXTMODE_SCRIPTS -DPERL_IMPLICIT_CONTEXT -DPERL_IMPLIC +IT_SYS -DU SE_PERLIO -D_USE_32BIT_TIME_T -MD -Zi -DNDEBUG -O1 -G7 -DVERSION=\" +0.71\" -D XS_VERSION=\"0.71\" "-IC:\perl517\lib\CORE" API.c API.c c:\Documents and Settings\Owner\Desktop\cpan libs\Win32API\g\call_i686 +.h(44) : w arning C4101: 'pReturn' : unreferenced local variable API.c(341) : warning C4047: '=' : 'SV *' differs in levels of indirect +ion from ' SV ** ' Running Mkbootstrap for Win32::API () PGC count 1097 PGC count 11209 PGC count 29097 C:\perl517\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Command -e chmod -- 644 AP +I.bs PGC count 29077 C:\perl517\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Mksymlists -e "Mksymlists +('NAME'=>\ "Win32::API\", 'DLBASE' => 'API', 'DL_FUNCS' => { }, 'FUNCLIST' => [] +, 'IMPORTS ' => { }, 'DL_VARS' => []);" PGC count 13027 link -out:blib\arch\auto\Win32\API\API.dll -dll -nologo -nodef +aultlib -d ebug -opt:ref,icf -libpath:"c:\perl517\lib\CORE" -machine:x86 API.ob +j C:\per l517\lib\CORE\perl517.lib oldnames.lib kernel32.lib user32.lib gdi32.l +ib winspoo l.lib comdlg32.lib advapi32.lib shell32.lib ole32.lib oleaut32.lib n +etapi32.li b uuid.lib ws2_32.lib mpr.lib winmm.lib version.lib odbc32.lib odbccp +32.lib com ctl32.lib msvcrt.lib -def:API.def Creating library blib\arch\auto\Win32\API\API.lib and object blib\a +rch\auto\W in32\API\API.exp if exist blib\arch\auto\Win32\API\API.dll.manifest mt -nologo +-manifest blib\arch\auto\Win32\API\API.dll.manifest -outputresource:blib\arch\au +to\Win32\A PI\API.dll;2 if exist blib\arch\auto\Win32\API\API.dll.manifest del blib\ar +ch\auto\Wi n32\API\API.dll.manifest C:\perl517\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Command -e chmod -- 755 bl +ib\arch\au to\Win32\API\API.dll PGC count 29077 PGC count 35325 C:\perl517\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Command -e cp -- API.bs bl +ib\arch\au to\Win32\API\API.bs PGC count 37097 C:\perl517\bin\perl.exe -MExtUtils::Command -e chmod -- 644 bl +ib\arch\au to\Win32\API\API.bs PGC count 29077 Files found in blib\arch: installing files in blib\lib into architectu +re depende nt library tree Installing C:\perl517\site\lib\auto\Win32\API\API.dll Installing C:\perl517\site\lib\auto\Win32\API\API.exp Installing C:\perl517\site\lib\auto\Win32\API\API.lib Installing C:\perl517\site\lib\auto\Win32\API\API.pdb Installing C:\perl517\site\lib\auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.dll Installing C:\perl517\site\lib\auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.exp Installing C:\perl517\site\lib\auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.lib Installing C:\perl517\site\lib\auto\Win32\API\Callback\Callback.pdb PGC count 140759 PGC count 6563 Appending installation info to c:\perl517\lib/perllocal.pod PGC count 1103 PGC count 29084 PGC count 6653 C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\Desktop\cpan libs\Win32API\g>


        Highest per process Perl_get_context count was 337157, assuming 4 ns wasted in PGC vs C stack my_perl, 1.34 ms of CPU was wasted in that process. nmake install took 11 seconds by the clock on the wall. Added all PGCs counts, comes to 2472747, * 4 ns is 9.8 ms. I am aware that 9.8ms is only %0.08 of the 11 seconds it took to run nmake install. I still say death by a 1000 cuts!

        Now about TLSGetValue directly.
        C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\Desktop\cpan libs\lxs>perl -MLocal::XS + -e "Local:: XS::CxtSpeed();" no cxt 47237378 cxt 13202140 no cxt no last error 22624295 C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\Desktop\cpan libs\lxs>
        Remember to get PL_thr_key is 2 asm dereferences in XS DLL vs 1 inside the interp itself.

        My next reply will address your letter C.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://995620]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (15)
As of 2014-07-29 19:16 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (226 votes), past polls