|laziness, impatience, and hubris|
Re^11: Use perl type without perlby BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Sep 26, 2012 at 00:53 UTC||Need Help??|
Separating the useful from the non-useful. I reply to the first part of your post separately.
Should I delete my post and post it to the other post?
No. But had you aimed more carefully, you might be righting the wrong you perceived, byt discussing it with the guy that perpetrated it, rather than having this (pointless part of this) discussion with me.
The OP was vague and didn't concisely explain anything, ...
So, to correct wrong of bad information -- that someone else posted -- you supplied some equally bad information, in reply to me?
Let's call this part of the discussion a misunderstanding and close it.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.