http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=995812


in reply to Re: dynamic number of threads based on CPU utilization
in thread dynamic number of threads based on CPU utilization

Thanks for the feedback with the bi-gramming. It turns out, I can simply store the bi-gram array directly as part of the hash...I will give that a shot later today and see how it does.

  • Comment on Re^2: dynamic number of threads based on CPU utilization

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: dynamic number of threads based on CPU utilization
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 26, 2012 at 16:38 UTC
    it turns out, I can simply store the bi-gram array directly as part of the hash..

    That will work, but be aware that accessing the data in a shared data structure is significantly slower than accessing non-shared memory. This is due to the need for internal locking amongst other things.

    So if you run a second pool of threads, each accessing that shared hash containing shared arrays, the lock contention between the threads will likely slow your processing to a crawl. (A simple fact of life with perl's shared data structures).

    Try the version I posted and see how you get on.


    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

    RIP Neil Armstrong