Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: TK: How to change color of readonly BrowseEntry

by mrider (Sexton)
on Oct 04, 2012 at 20:06 UTC ( #997318=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: TK: How to change color of readonly BrowseEntry
in thread SOLVED - TK: How to change color of readonly BrowseEntry

Let me get this straight: You're seriously suggesting that I maintain my own distribution because the author can't be arsed to test their own module?

I don't think so...

 

 

Apparently I can't reply to the reply below, it will be too deep of a level. So I'll reply here:

(A.M.)Yup, I think so. You are the author now. You should ship working software, not task your users to read a readme then install and hand-edit some module.

In case you missed this point in the original question - this is an internal use only reporting tool. My users won't even know what programming language I'm using, and the users don't have permissions to install software at all. The "instructions" would be if someone needed to duplicate my development environment, not instructions for my users.

 

 

(A.M.)There really is no maintenance, besides the maintenance you do already (installing modules on your dev machine), after than its a one or two clicks and you're uploading your own binary release with the latest version from your dev machine

The level of difficulty is totally beside the point. The original author has left the code in place with a stupid effing mistake for who knows how long. Additionally, the author has a number of outstanding bugs that aren't even being addressed or looked at. Pretty much not a situation that engenders a feeling that this is something I want to maintain myself.

TLDR: No chance that's happening. Not a chance in hades.


Comment on Re^4: TK: How to change color of readonly BrowseEntry
Re^5: TK: How to change color of readonly BrowseEntry
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 04, 2012 at 20:41 UTC

    Let me get this straight: You're seriously suggesting that I maintain my own distribution because the author can't be arsed to test their own module?

    Yup, I think so. You are the author now. You should ship working software, not task your users to read a readme then install and hand-edit some module

    There really is no maintenance, besides the maintenance you do already (installing modules on your dev machine), after than its a one or two clicks and you're uploading your own binary release with the latest version from your dev machine

Re^5: TK: How to change color of readonly BrowseEntry
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 05, 2012 at 07:30 UTC

    The level of difficulty is totally beside the point. The original author has left the code in place with a stupid effing mistake for who knows how long. Additionally, the author has a number of outstanding bugs that aren't even being addressed or looked at. Pretty much not a situation that engenders a feeling that this is something I want to maintain myself.

    TLDR: No chance that's happening. Not a chance in hades.

    Well, if you're not going to use it, presumably then your users wouldn't need to download it and patch it anymore , then yeah, it now makes no sense for you to install/patch/distribute it to save your users some hassle -- regardless of how easy it is -- no duh

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://997318]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2014-09-16 07:23 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite cookbook is:










    Results (157 votes), past polls