Your skill will accomplishwhat the force of many cannot PerlMonks

### Comment on

 Need Help??

Hm. To me, that was clearly not an option.

My doubt centers around this:

```0 _      _ 3
\    /
1 _ \  / _ 4
\ \/ /
2 __\/\/__ 2
/\/\
3 _/ /\ \_ 0
/  \
4 _/    \_ 1

The crossovers between: the 0 & 3 wires; and the 1 & 4 wires are "vertically adjacent". Ie. As close together vertically as two crossovers can be. It also means that the striaght through 2 wire has a large break which cannot be filled, leaving its continuity unclear.

Both of these things can be addressed like this:

```0 ___    ___ 3
\  /
1 _   \/   _ 4
\  /\  /
2 __\/__\/__ 2
/\  /\
3 _/  \/  \_ 0
/\
4 ___/  \___ 1

This makes for a much clearer diagram, but that means that all the crossovers are 'on the wire lines' rather than between them. It also may be seen to contravene the "It is considered elegant not to make the grid wider than it has to be." rule.

So maybe it would need to be something like:

```0 _____  _____ 3
\/
1 _    /\    _ 4
\  /  \  /
2 __\/____\/__ 2
/\    /\
3 _/  \  /  \_ 0
\/
4 _____/\_____ 1

But that still leaves some crossovers occurring on wire lines rather than between them. So maybe:

```0 _____  _____ 3
\/
1 ___  /\  ___ 4
\/  \/
2 __ /\__/\___ 2
/  \/  \
3 _/   /\   \_ 0
/  \
4 ___/    \___ 1

The 2 line sucks and it destroys the natural symmetry, but it more clearly complies with the rules -- except perhaps the no wider than necessary. Unless it is necessary to be that wide in order to comply with the other rules :)

It is an interesting programming problem, but it would suck to implement a brilliant solution, only to be failed because the problem description was ambiguous.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority

In reply to Re^3: The Perl 6 Coding Contest 2012 by BrowserUk
in thread The Perl 6 Coding Contest 2012 by moritz

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

• Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
• Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
• Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
• Please read these before you post! —
• Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
• You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
 For: Use: & & < < > > [ [ ] ]
• Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
• See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.

Create A New User
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (6)
As of 2018-03-18 00:31 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
Voting Booth?
When I think of a mole I think of:

Results (228 votes). Check out past polls.

Notices?