|
|
|
Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer |
|
| PerlMonks |
Comment on |
| ( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
Two things to note: 1) It's a shame that perl did not come up with named captures. It was already available at least in .NET (and Ruby, I believe?) before perl 5.10 was released. 2) %+ is rather slow. That said, named capture *is* a godsend. This feature belong to the "how did I manage to get by without this" category. In reply to Re: No questions. Just a "thank you for named captures" !!
by sedusedan
|
|