Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

I have been taking both approaches.

I have been working on project where I knew that I would have to write 8 to 10 different programs and that all of them would need some common functions. So, in these cases, I wrote the module first with the functions that I needed to share, tested it, and then the programs using these modules. However, despite relatively careful planning, I still had to change the module in the course of writing the programs using them, because I figured out that some more code could be shared between programs. I can remember at least 4 projects where this happened, but there might have been more.

In other cases, it starts as a couple of function for one program et evolves towards a module. Recently, for example, I wrote my first program in a brand new system. Some of the code was needed more than once, so I made a couple of functions to avoid code duplication. A couple of weeks later, I had to make another program, and I figured out that the same functions would be needed. I copied and pasted the code of the function to deliver this second program quickly (in my opinion, a module needs careful design and should not be made in emergency) and decided that I would take the time to write a module to encapsulate the repeated code for next time. Since then, I have written half a dozen other programs using that module and I have some more to do in the next days. I am quite happy of the fact that I did not have to change the module so far, because I designed in a sufficiently generic way as to work in all cases so far. It would not have been the case if I had settle to write it earlier, before I knew enough about the type of things I would need to do on this new system.

I think that both approaches have pros and cons.


In reply to Re: Developing code to be a module by Laurent_R
in thread Developing code to be a module by rpnoble419

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others musing on the Monastery: (4)
    As of 2014-11-28 04:24 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      My preferred Perl binaries come from:














      Results (193 votes), past polls