Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??
ya,.. its also strange to me
here the code in its current state:
sub AnalyseMapFile { my $self = shift; my $MapFile = $self->{MAPFILEINFO}{MAPFILECONTENT}; my $PlaceToPutInformation = $self->{MEMORYMAP}; $self->{MAPFILEINFO}{ProfileInformation} = $ProfileInformation; my $memory_section = ''; my $state = 0; my $memory_size = 0; my $state_smybol = { 1 => 'Image component sizes', 2 => ' Code \(inc\. data\) RO Data RW Data ZI Dat +a Debug Object Name', }; #Each config profile defines its own way how to parse the map-file +. #Process map-file for ( my $iterator = $ProfileInformation->{'StartLine'} ; $iterator < @$MapFile ; $iterator++ ) { chomp($MapFile->[$iterator]); next if (! $MapFile->[$iterator]); if (( $state == 0 ) ###THIS IS LINE 104 && ( $MapFile->[$iterator] =~m/$MTA::Profile_ARM::state_symbo +l->{1}/)) { $state = 1; next; } elsif (( $state == 1 ) && ( $MapFile->[$iterator] =~m/$MTA::Pr +ofile_ARM::state_symbol->{2}/)) { $state = 2; next; } elsif ( $state == 2 ) { #Get module information my($Code, $CodeData, $ROData, $RWData, $ZIData, $Debug, $O +bjName) = split(/\s/,$MapFile->[$iterator]);
and I get this message from perl-diagnostics, moreover i am using eclipse and epic-plugin and strawberryperl 5.10.0.
The warning looks like this:
Use of uninitialized value in regexp compilation at D:/_Debug/Project/profile_ARM.pm line 104 (#1) (W uninitialized) An undefined value was used as if it were alread +y defined. It was interpreted as a "" or a 0, but maybe it was a mi +stake. To suppress this warning assign a defined value to your variables. To help you figure out what was undefined, perl will try to tell y +ou the name of the variable (if any) that was undefined. In some cases it + cannot do this, so it also tells you what operation you used the undefine +d value in. Note, however, that perl optimizes your program and the opera +tion displayed in the warning may not necessarily appear literally in y +our program. For example, "that $foo" is usually optimized into "that + " . $foo, and the warning will refer to the concatenation (.) operat +or, even though there is no . in your program.


Ok, i am just guessing that this is because of the dereferencing, but the scalar
$state is initialized with '0'. So I am running out of plans...

In reply to Re^2: Dereference inside a regex by tobias_hofer
in thread Dereference inside a regex by tobias_hofer

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (19)
    As of 2015-07-07 14:40 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









      Results (89 votes), past polls