|The stupid question is the question not asked|
If we need to change those names, this code will be break pretty quickly.
Not only that, but forcing a client to write
requires them to know that a purchase order has a status, and that the status has a name. Both of those details are probably inappropriate for client code that deals with purchase orders to have to know. It also makes purchase orders harder to unit test, since you then have to either unit test a Status at the same time, or rig up mock objects to use in places of a Status. By structuring the API like
you reduce the complexity of testing.
There's a design principle--whose name I'm blanking on (Demeter's Law -- thanks, lachoy)--that says that if you find yourself writing expressions that navigate more than one level into an object structure, the top-level object needs a different protocol. In the case above, can_send is that new protocol, and status can be made private (e.g., by renaming it to _status).
In reply to Re: Short Refactoring Tip: let the object do it for you