Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

A few days ago I started to again work on implementing predicate logic in Perl. I know it can be done. I just need that epiphany that makes me slap my forehead. I stopped working on the latest implementation because it was awful, but I kept thinking about the problem. Basically, to get anything similar to Prolog in Perl, I need backtracking. The only thing in Perl which implements backtracking is a regular expression. I'm pretty sure the key lies there.

This morning, I thought I had the epiphany. What if, given a set of facts, I would like to know who owns gold?

my $facts = <<END_FACTS; owns merlyn gold owns Ovid books gives Ovid books kudra owns kudra gold END_FACTS + + my $query = qr/owns (\S+) gold/; my @who = $facts =~ /$query/mg;

That assigns "merlyn" and "kudra" to @who, but it's not really useful. What if I want the query to be something like "who owns something valuable?" I can do this:

use Data::Dumper; use constant SUCCEED => qr{(?=)}; use constant FAIL => qr{(?!)}; + + my $owns = <<END_FACTS; owns merlyn gold owns Ovid books owns kudra gold END_FACTS + + my $valuable = <<END_VALUABLE; valuable Perl valuable gold valuable Corinna END_VALUABLE + + my $is_valuable = qr[(\S+)(??{match($valuable, "valuable $2")})]; my $owns_query = qr/owns (\S+) $is_valuable/; # here's the magic! my @who = $owns =~ /$owns_query/mg; print Dumper \@who; + + sub match { my ($facts, $query) = @_; my $sleep_count = 0; my $pid; do { $pid = open KID_TO_READ, "-|"; unless (defined $pid) { die "Couldn't fork" if $sleep_count++ > 6; sleep 1; } } until defined $pid; + + unless ($pid) { # child if ($facts =~ $query) { print SUCCEED; } else { print FAIL; } } else { # parent my $result = <KID_TO_READ>; close KID_TO_READ; return $result; } }

The prints out:

$VAR1 = [ 'merlyn', 'gold', 'kudra', 'gold' ];

That's great. Once I can autogenerate those regexes and clean up the output I can wrap this up in a pretty framework and do all of the predicate logic programming I want.

Uh, no I can't. Regular expressions are not reentrant, thus forcing me to fork off a new process for every regex "nested" inside of the main query (such as the "is_valuable" condition). This winds up being so ridiculously slow that it's probably not worth much more than a toy. I also suspect that a complicated query will suck memory like a Hoover. Any suggestions to get around this, or am I stuck?

Cheers,
Ovid

New address of my CGI Course.


In reply to Being Forced to Fork with Nested Regular Expressions by Ovid

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others about the Monastery: (11)
    As of 2014-07-30 14:14 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









      Results (234 votes), past polls