I find the following text:
MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!"
unacceptably offensive on two grounds
One mans opinion. Why not use your module yourself then?
As one accustomed to rigorous academic debate I find woosy responses and unsound arguments totally offensive. But should they be reaped? NO! If the words in question were an undisguised personal insult then there may be a case for reaping. But otherwise? They are part of lifes rich tapestry and like others, I have to say I enjoy those words. Much more meaningful than 'garbage in , garbage out' or however else you might like to describe the phenomenon.
Perl Monks is just like television, if you don't like the content, find the off switch.
jdtoronto
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|
