Me too. Question is, which way is neatest. Can it be done with one char? In fact, I'm fairly convinced it can't. I can come up with several two-char changes which make it work, but no one-chars.
Ok. given that there's spoilers on here already, and a post explaining why it's broken:
which of these did you think cleaner (my vote is for the first)
(0|$a|$b|$c|$d) < 256
($a+0|$b|$c|$d) < 256
The key here is that | (a bitwise operator) will operate on pairs of chars if both of it's args are a string. In other words, for
"abc" | "def" it does ("a"|"d").("b"|"e").("c"|"f"). However, if either arg has been used in a numeric expression, the evaluation will be done with both sides as a number.
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
| & || & |
| < || < |
| > || > |
| [ || [ |
| ] || ] ||