Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

Funny. I thought that I just said that Attribute::Property is an unacceptable solution to me. That means that it doesn't take away the issue.

I'm not disagreeing about that. You said that I indicated something; I cannot recall having indicated that exact thing, and tried to correct.

Let's not make a big deal out of everything. Feel offended if you wish, but please only do so knowing that I didn't mean "flawed" as an absolute condemnation and that no offense was intended. I like Perl for its tolerance towards almost all programming styles, but that doesn't mean I steer clear of discussion.

With OO I'd expect to be able to do something like create a Length module, Length objects can be accessed/set in various units (inches, meters, feet, miles, etc). An external user should have no idea what the internal representation is. How do I do it with lvalues?

In that rather specific case I would not use lvalues, or any setter method, for that matter. I'd be inclined to think of these values as immutable objects, and have something like:

package Length; sub new { my ($class, $value, $unit) = @_; # Create $self and store the value in standard form. # In case of length this means converting the length to meters. } sub as_km { shift->{_m} / 1000 } sub as_hm { shift->{_m} / 100 } sub as_dam { shift->{_m} / 10 } sub as_m { shift->{_m} } sub as_dm { shift->{_m} * 10 } sub as_cm { shift->{_m} * 100 } sub as_mm { shift->{_m} * 1000 } # Or, if this were really something I made, just: sub as { my ($self, $unit) = @_; # ... }
But instead of using Length objects, I am much more likely to dictate that every length must be stored in meters, as a number. Possibly with the addition of utility functions to aid in conversion.

And whichever I do, I'll feel free to dislike people who categorically declare that my considered set of choices are flawed.

I'm sorry you make this about people. I wonder, though, how you survive PM if you take offense every time someone disagrees with you on a technical subject. You are of course free to dislike me, or any person. Even though we will probably never meet in person, I regret that you dislike *me* instead of only what I said.

Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }


In reply to Re^5: Use method/function signatures with Perl by Juerd
in thread Use method/function signatures with Perl by Ovid

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (19)
    As of 2015-07-01 20:12 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









      Results (19 votes), past polls