Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

Some (possibly biased - decide for yourself) opinions on this:

  • The Perl test by Brainbench does as well as one can do with a 40 question, web-based test. The test uses an adaptive scoring technique, so you will get harder questions if you answer the first ones correctly, and easier questions, if you don't. I doubt that you can build a web-based multiple choice test that can do much better.
  • Obviously, a multiple-choice test is not able to test a complex skillset like programming adequately. Neither is an interview, nor a resume. Put bluntly, there are no known methods to test complex skillsets like programming in an adequate, efficient and economical way. Proven track records, customer references, assessment centers, extensive structured interviews, examples of former work, and trial periods are probably the most effective means of evaluating the skill of a programmer.
  • A web-based, free service like Brainbench is a Good Thing for people without a formal education or similar documentable achievements to provide some indication on their abilities.
  • Tests like the one at Brainbench are good screening tools, IMHO. If somebody is not able to pass this test (privately, on his own, I mean, not as part of an interview procedure), this is a strong indication that this person has not a deep knowledge of Perl, or has no motivation to show his knowledge in this test. Thus, this test can save a lot of time in evaluating possible candidates, at a minimum cost.

I think the main line of critique against web-based certification services like Brainbench is in essence a critique of formalized testing procedures (like multiple-choice tests) as such. This may have some merit, but in the end anybody arguing against formalized testing procedures will have to provide some alternatives when facing the decision on how to evaluate candidates for a given job. Usually these alternatives will be more subjective (face-to-face or even telephone interview, recommendations, etc.) and/or more expensive (assessment center, trial periods, etc.).

Christian Lemburg
Brainbench MVP for Perl

In reply to Re: Web-based certification services by clemburg
in thread Web-based certification services by brother ab

Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    and all is quiet...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others perusing the Monastery: (4)
    As of 2018-02-20 08:37 GMT
    Find Nodes?
      Voting Booth?
      When it is dark outside I am happiest to see ...

      Results (268 votes). Check out past polls.