Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

Today at a testing talk at OSCON, dominus raised an important point. How do you write a test when you don't know what you're going to be testing? This is actually more common than you would think. I've discovered this happening in two different cases. The first case is when I've got a neat idea but I don't know how to implement it. When that occurs, I often just play around with code and see what happens. Sometimes I'm playing around with the code for a long time, running it by hand, seeing what it does, etc.

The second case, though less common, is when I'm porting code from another language. Usually that code lacks tests. Further, sometimes I'm either unfamiliar with the language or, more commonly, the code is very dense (or I am) and I'm not sure what it's doing. However, by porting all of the code I can compare end results and see that they're the same.

So how do I do test-driven development here? wickline mentioned that he'll then comment out the code and then start writing tests, adding back in code as he has the tests. I'd like to expand on that for a bit.

When I comment out the code and write the tests, there are three cases that can occur for each test.

  1. The test fails the way I expect it to.
  2. The test fails in an unexpected manner.
  3. The test passes.

The first case is the desireable one. Theoretically, I can then add back in the code I've written and cases 2 or 3 subsequently apply.

However, the code will sometimes fail in an unexpected way. If I'm writing a test that a particular line read from a file matches a regex and the test tells me that I'm trying to read from an unopened filehandle, it means I have a poor understanding of my code and I need to find out what's going on.

Sometimes, though, the test will pass. Once I had a test pass and it was because I had forgotten about some previous input validation I had. As a result, this suggested that I was on the verge of writing code I didn't need.

A common case where tests pass is with the can_ok $CLASS, $method; test. This gets tricky. Did I already write a method with that name? Did some naughty module import that method into my namespace? Did I inherit the method and am about to override it? Once again, I find myself in the position of having a poor understanding of my already written code and backing out the code and then writing a test protects me once again.

Cheers,
Ovid

New address of my CGI Course.


In reply to When test-driven development just won't do by Ovid

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (8)
    As of 2014-07-29 07:15 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









      Results (211 votes), past polls