I am not convinced by that node.
I know that Date::Manip has disadvantages and is not always the module to use, but I don't see why it's wrong here. I don't think this task needs high speed or full i18n. I do like Date::Manip for such quick tasks like this, because it's easy to use.
You say that the API is not consistent. There's only a handful of functions I have to use, and they aren't inconsistent IMO. (The functions are UnixDate, DateCalc, Date_Cmp, ParseDate, ParseDateDelta.) Having to use a few functions that can do almost anything (ok, I needed timezone conversion once) makes the module very easy to use which is more important than consistency in small and simple tasks like this.
You are right that the module docs say
If you're only doing fairly simple date
operations (parsing common date formats, finding the difference between
two dates, etc.), the other modules will almost certainly suffice.
but contrary to this I still find the module good for these tasks.
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
| & || & |
| < || < |
| > || > |
| [ || [ |
| ] || ] ||