Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
Thank you. I haven't read the book, which prevents me from disagreeing with its conclusions without being an ass.

I'm going to disagree now, but I still haven't read the book. I'm relying on your interpretation. So perhaps that's worth half.

My half-assed opinion: /m is usually irrelevant to what people expect. The vast majority of programs end up reading things line-by-line. If you're only looking at a line at a time, then /m has no effect.

Therefore, it is only relevant in the less-common circumstances when you have embedded newlines. I find that in those cases, I sometimes mean one thing, sometimes the other. As a result, I find /m sometimes useful, and sometimes it does the opposite of what I want. So I use it when it is what I need, and when reading such code, the existence of that option is a very useful indicator of what the expression is doing. Using it all the time, even when it has no effect, harms readability.

As for /s, consider this common idiom:

while (<>) { if (/^title:\s*(.*)/i) { $title = $1; } }
What does that do? Well, it looks at a config file for a line saying "Title: The Adventures of the Were-Gerbil" and pulls out the title. If that included the newline, I would be rather annoyed. It's like asking someone "what's in the bag?" and receiving the answer "an apple, a sandwich, and a bunch of air". Smartass.

Also, similarly to /m, I use /s specifically in situations where I want to do something unexpected with respect to newlines. I prefer using it sparingly, so that those situations are more noticeable. Most of the time, I'd rather use something like [\w\W] rather than a trailing /s, especially when what I really want is a mixture of both possible meanings of '.'.

Always using /x, on the other hand, makes sense to me, even though I haven't switched over to it yet. Even in the absence of comments, I often like using it simply for readability: /\s*\((.*?)\)/ is just a lot harder to follow than /\s* \( (.*?) \)/x, and the latter could get away without a comment, IMH(-A)O.

In reply to Re^2: Best practice or cargo cult? by sfink
in thread Best practice or cargo cult? by robinbowes

Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    [Your Mother]: Forgot to sign in as my sockpuppet, how embarrassing!
    [1nickt]: pryrt I am creating a Type to check valid user IDs, which must be a whole number greater than or equal to zero. I would like to disallow 1.0 but because of this behaviour, by the time it is checked by the constraint, it *is* an Int.
    [LanX]: should this be considered? Re: Parsing .txt into arrays
    [LanX]: and this Re^4: Hash user input
    [pryrt]: LanX, I would vote "keep" if it were considered: it's not helpful, but it could be taken multiple ways, not all of which are offenseive...
    [pryrt]: 1nickt: if you are checking for valid user IDs, then I wouldn't care about the difference between 1.0 and 1: I would take either as a valid representation of the integer user ID#1
    [LanX]: and this Re^2: extract column data
    [Lady_Aleena]: I have two sub recurse { my ($directory, $other_var) = @_; my @files = file_list($directo ry); for my $file (@files) { if (-f $file) { do "stuff"; } if (-d $file) { recurse(" $directory/$file" , $other_var); } } } This was when I hated File::Find.
    [tobyink]: 1nickt: your code?
    [LanX]: pryrt: yeah, that's why I didn't consider, but the last >10 anonymous posts are from the same troll-person

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others meditating upon the Monastery: (14)
    As of 2017-05-24 20:14 GMT
    Find Nodes?
      Voting Booth?