Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
Hello.

Is using 'Cookies' impractical for 'Contact Us' forms?

What about those folks whose computers don't allow cookies to be enabled (e.g. their PC at work)? How to allow those folks to use the E-mail form to 'Contact Us'?

Posting phone#'s is getting abused at times in similar ways as mining E-mail addresses for mailing lists. I see more and more websites having E-mail-only (via E-mail forms) as the only method for contacting them.

I want to use cookies for session management where the cookie expires. This includes image verification that uses cookies. I'm trying to create some resistance to bots; multiple submissions; protect website in shared environments; etc.

Is this a Catch-22? Do I have to decide to just not have everyone with the ability to 'Contact Us'?

Currently, I am setting up to use cookies with a database for sessions validation, but am I locking out too many people if I use this method of security, thus making it 'impractical'?

Should/Could I use another method instead of cookies, e.g. a file that is deleted after some time period which would contain the same info as a cookie and still allow for comparing the session entry stored in a database? If so, how?

Thanks in advance.


In reply to Is using 'Cookies' impractical for 'Contact Us' forms? by newbie00

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    [thezip]: Ooops... I lied. I guess Cygwin is back. I'll just do a tail -f instead. Better. Sorry for the noise.
    [Corion]: Once more, I'm looking for a sane client-side framework, but I guess these don't exist. Everything I look at either uses a weirdo home-grown templating language (like Angular in all its incarnations) or uses weirdo Javascript incarnations (like ...
    [Corion]: ... Inferno.js, which uses ES2015) or uses some horrible amount of Javascript infrastructure before you can even render a single file.
    [Corion]: I'd really like to create a dynamic frontend for my Google Keep clone, but so far, all the templating solutions seem to bring their own template language or require me to hand-code everything in (their own flavour of) Javascript. I'd like something ...
    [Corion]: ... that can use templates from the HTML (via <script language="text/ template">... my template ...</script> and otherwise gets out of my way. But it seems that is not how the Javascript world is, currently :-/

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (11)
    As of 2017-03-27 18:58 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?
      Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?



      Results (321 votes). Check out past polls.