|Problems? Is your data what you think it is?|
Comment onby gods
|on Feb 11, 2000 at 00:06 UTC||Need Help??|
Magic numbers do not solve the problem completely. Old versions of MS Word use a file format that is also used by other products. For example, old Crystal Reports files are often misidentified as MS Word files.
But the OP gave a nice clue: *.docx -- that means a newer MS Word, stuffing XML into a ZIP file. So, if we talk ONLY about newer MS Word files in zipped XML format, the file can be testet easily: Try to open the file using Archive::ZIP (it is a ZIP file, after all). Look inside the archive, try to find an XML file with the name MS Word uses for the content, unpack that file from the archive. Use an XML parser to see if the file has one of the well-known type declarations for MS Word (or similar products, if you want to allow OpenOffice and friends). Should any of those steps fail, the input file is not a valid *.docx MS Word file.
If also old MS Word files (*.doc) have to be processed, you need a second test routine that can properly detect the old MS Word binary dump formats. There are several, one for each version. Testing "magic numbers" works well most of the times, but you may have false positives (see above).
Word can also read and write Rich Text Format files (*.rtf). If this format has to be processed, you need a third test. Again, "magic numbers" may work here. CPAN has some RTF readers, using them to test for a valid file should give less false positives.
Today I will gladly share my knowledge and experience, for there are no sweeter words than "I told you so". ;-)