Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??
I ran some benchmarks and I the real answer is that while <..> has been finely tuned. On a large file it is almost as fast as foreach over a list.
/dev/null
               Rate        for     whyfor      while while_list   for_list
for        374878/s         --       -13%       -15%       -55%       -62%
whyfor     433016/s        16%         --        -2%       -48%       -56%
while      442469/s        18%         2%         --       -47%       -55%
while_list 833025/s       122%        92%        88%         --       -16%
for_list   991880/s       165%       129%       124%        19%         --

/usr/share/dict/words
             Rate        for while_list     whyfor      while   for_list
for        4.80/s         --       -35%       -37%       -38%       -43%
while_list 7.40/s        54%         --        -2%        -5%       -13%
whyfor     7.57/s        58%         2%         --        -2%       -11%
while      7.75/s        62%         5%         2%         --        -9%
for_list   8.48/s        77%        15%        12%         9%         --

/etc/passwd
              Rate        for     whyfor      while while_list   for_list
for        14440/s         --       -13%       -16%       -24%       -49%
whyfor     16599/s        15%         --        -4%       -12%       -42%
while      17224/s        19%         4%         --        -9%       -39%
while_list 18915/s        31%        14%        10%         --       -33%
for_list   28442/s        97%        71%        65%        50%         --
#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use Benchmark qw( cmpthese ); foreach my $file qw ( /dev/null /usr/share/dict/words /etc/passwd ) { open my $IN1, '<', $file or die "could not open $file"; my @list = <$IN1>; seek( $IN1, 0, 0 ); print "$file\n"; cmpthese( -5, { for_list => sub { my %counts = (); ++$counts{$_} for @list; die unless keys %counts == @list; }, while_list => sub { my $x = 0; my %counts = (); ++$counts{$_} while defined( $_ = $list[ $x++ ] ); die unless keys %counts == @list; }, for => sub { seek( $IN1, 0, 0 ); my %counts = (); ++$counts{$_} for <$IN1>; die unless keys %counts == @list; }, while => sub { seek( $IN1, 0, 0 ); my %counts = (); ++$counts{$_} while <$IN1>; die unless keys %counts == @list; }, whyfor => sub { seek( $IN1, 0, 0 ); my %counts = (); for ( ; defined( $_ = <$IN1> ) ; ) { ++$counts{$_}; } die unless keys %counts == @list; }, } ); }
-- gam3
A picture is worth a thousand words, but takes 200K.

In reply to Re: Why is "for" much slower than "while"? by gam3
in thread Why is "for" much slower than "while"? by di

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others contemplating the Monastery: (3)
    As of 2015-07-28 02:49 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









      Results (251 votes), past polls