Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Oops! You are mistaken...
Prints: camel Update: zdog asked about this in a private CB message so here goes. tomhukins is not quite correct in his description of the problem. What happens is this: grep ("$_", @redundant) in a scalar context returns the number of times the expression $_ is true for all the elements of @redundant. But the first time through, there are no elements in @redundant so $_ is evaluated zero times. So the first time through the loop, the "next if" fails and "camel" is pushed onto @redundant. Each time through the loop after than, @redundant does contain an element and the grep in a scalar context returns 1 meaning "for the one element in @redundant, $_ (the element 'camel') is true." (Note: I am aware of the discussion about whether to say that grep always returns a list but that a list in scalar context evaluates to the number of elements or whether to say that grep in a scalar context returns a number. perlfunc says: "In scalar context, [grep] returns the number of times the expression was true.") In reply to Re: (zdog) Re: Finding Redundant values in arrays
by dvergin
|
|