Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??
Hi monks ,

i have a question for you. It is more of a theoretical question, question requiring a tip rather then the actual code. so the problem is i have this bit-vector of size N:

Example: A: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
and what i need to figure out is the position of an overall minimum given two indexes i,j. so if this is the vector and 1 marks the point of increase and 0 marks the point of decrease in some not known value,then the vector can be converted into :

if i start counting from 10 then B[0] = A[0]+10 = 11 B: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 10 9 10 9 10 9 8 7 8 7 6
Essentially what i have here is a Cartesian tree. and this means that there are only certain types of indexes that can be picked:

i,j = B[1],B[7] (A[1],A[7]) i,j != B[6],B[10] -> then there are two min positions (B[1] and B[7]) +and this cannot be....
so given two indexes B[1],B[7] I wolud like to figure out the min value between them which in my example is 8 on the position B[7].

current solutions all include dealing with this problem by precomputing the Sparse table and then do constant time picks-> and this is really fast, but in my case i cannot create an array type B nor a classical Sparse table since i'm bound by dealing only with bits, meaning, all i have and can work with are the arrays of type A (bit-vector). so my current solution is to divide the A into chunks and then evaluate if the overall min of the chunk is greater or smaller then the overall min of the previous chunk and then create another bit-vector reflecting the relative overall growth or decay and then do this in a tree fashion until i reach the symmetrical min (here what i have is a binary tree). problem with this approach is that it runs rather slow since i cannot do constant picks like in the Sparse table and construction complexity increases from n -> n log n. since i'm running this on big datasets, putting one such structure in memory (using 64 bit OS) memory requirements grow up to 300 GB of ram (i tested it the other day on the university cluster :))

so my question is , does anyone have an idea on how to do this type of searches without building the actual tree atop the initial bit-vector (A) like i'm doing now.



In reply to bit-vector > global minimum by baxy77bax

Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others exploiting the Monastery: (8)
    As of 2014-10-25 12:44 GMT
    Find Nodes?
      Voting Booth?

      For retirement, I am banking on:

      Results (143 votes), past polls