We don't bite newbies here... much | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I have experience with both; however, note the following which may temper your ultimate choice. I've used both on Windows XP but not on any other Windows version. The last version of ActivePerl I used was perl-5.10.? (and haven't used it in ~2 years); the last version of Strawberry Perl I used was perl-5.12.0 (and haven't used it in ~6 months). I found the installation of both to be straightforward and, to the best of my recollection, hassle-free. Running Perl scripts was equally easy on both. The main difference becomes evident when you want to use modules (simplistically, these are files with pre-written code which you can selectively add to your Perl scripts). When you install Perl, you'll automatically get some hundreds of modules (see perldoc). Depending on what you want to use Perl for, you'll probably also want to access some of the many thousands of user-contributed modules (see CPAN). With ActivePerl, you'll only have access to a subset (albeit, quite possibly, a perfectly adequate subset) of these extra modules via the Perl Package Manager (PPM) which downloads and installs modules that have been specifically prepared to work with ActivePerl. Strawberry Perl, on the other hand, provides a number of tools that allow you to install (to the best of my recollection) any module: mostly, this is no more difficult than using ActivePerl's PPM but there may be cases that prove somewhat more daunting (depending on your general computer proficiency).
To get a better answer, you might like to update your original post with additional information such as:
-- Ken In reply to Re: Which is better: ActiveState or Strawberry Perl?
by kcott
|
|