|Traditionally, Perl uses the same toolchain that it was built with for building its modules.
Is it just a tradition or is it more? Is it possible to use different make programs even for different Perl modules?
I'm not sure why you would want to change that, because that toolchain is proven to work well.
I am thinking of:
Most likely, changing the make utility involves patching ExtUtils::MakeMaker to properly recognize the new type of make tool and produce the appropriate output.
- Difficult to find good documentation on Dmake
- GNU Make is more known than Dmake. There is a bigger user community.
- GNU Make has a bigger “maintenance” group, with more frequent releases.
Yes, I know. And ExtUtils::MakeMaker is also "doomed" by it's maintainer!
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
| & || & |
| < || < |
| > || > |
| [ || [ |
| ] || ] ||
Others browsing the Monastery:
(4)As of 2017-01-24 19:38 GMT