Do you know where your variables are? | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
after some days of thoughts an digestion I'd really prefer ->>
Not only because it's easy to type, it's close enough to -> be easily read and understood as an extension for a special case This follows the same approach like == and === in JS, where repetition indicates a specialization. ~> looks nice at first glance, but is too easy to be overlooked in some fonts and at the moment I have to deal with too many low level Perl users who wouldn't spot it. ?-> or &-> might have a derivable logic, but look too much like line noise. And it's not very consequent to allow &-> if we are sure that there will never be a |-> or !->.
Cheers Rolf In reply to Re: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
by LanX
|
|