|
|
|
good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
| PerlMonks |
Comment on |
| ( #3333=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
I would expect the file access time to dominate everything else, so choice of hash won't matter too much. You could try benchmarking different ones to see, maybe sha256 & md5? There was an interesting thread at high speed checksum for video finger printing?. You could possibly use a similar technique for your larger files, but you've still got to read it off the disk. OTOH you could just use rsync and go get a coffee :) In reply to Re: [OT]:Faster signature algorithm than md5?
by RichardK
|
|