|No such thing as a small change|
Whilst I agree that any expectation that the membership here is anything more than a small percentage of the Perl programmers (as opposed to users for whom the percentage would probably be immeasurable :) around the world, is naive; I think your most visited stats are maybe suspect.
I guess it depends on who's numbers you believe; but also what they choose to measure.
Lies & damned lies aside, it'd be interesting to see an aggregate score.
First time I ever looked at such statistics. For all the billions of websites, the vast majority must get precious little traffic.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re^7: Is PerlMonks relevant for one's Perl marketability?