Re^2: Moose stringification overloading isn't working

[dd-b]

Drat. Does that mean the concept and execution seems sound and you need more detail, or just that you didn't look at it because it wasn't a self-contained bagged sample?

As I said, the small sample I built worked, so I'd have to chase it up the tree. Which I will if necessary, if there's nothing obviously wrong with the approach.

[Anonymous Monk]

It means code is clearer than words :) and your question is unclear (to me)

If I had the same question, first thing I would do is try to replicate it in a short self contained example, and then I'd either have a test case, or I'd figure out where I'm confused, or have some code to show what I'm trying to accomplish

Code can be much clearer than English