Re^2: Is it wiser to move on from XML::Simple to XML::Compile

in reply to Re: Is it wiser to move on from XML::Simple to XML::Compile
in thread Is it wiser to move on from XML::Simple to XML::Compile

Thanks for reply.
I agree XML::Compile does not belong in this comparison.
This comparison should not be considered as comparisons of performance of different parsers.
I was just trying to compare these for my case and really think XML::Compile a great code. It supports all schema validations etc and fits well for my case too. I was looking for a possible plug in to XML::Simple with better performance.
I had checked XML::LibXML::Simple too but not of much difference as both take much time in converting to perl hash than actual parsing.
Here is result for two

                s/iter xmllibxmlsimple       xmlsimple
xmllibxmlsimple   22.8              --             -3%
xmlsimple         22.2              3%              --
[download]

Comment on Re^2: Is it wiser to move on from XML::Simple to XML::Compile Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Is it wiser to move on from XML::Simple to XML::Compile by markov (Scribe) on Jan 27, 2014 at 10:57 UTC
XML::Fast is also creating HASHes. The difference might be that it construct those in XS, where ::Simple need to cross the expensive XS <-> Perl border for each node.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom