in reply to Re: Nested Quantum::Superpositions
in thread Nested Quantum::Superpositions
Ok. Realizing that all(1,4)!= all(1,4) helps me a bunch - thanks to all posters. As a followup, it seems to me that the docs must be in error when they imply that the following code could ever work...
After all, I think that it has been illustrated that an "n-all" where n>1 cannot eq anything. Am I wrong?
update: Of course, I am wrong about this. I must have had those Friday-morning blinders on. An "n-all" cannot eq an "n-all" of the same order (update: except if ni=C for 0<=i<=ordern-1 (e.g. all(1,1,1) == all(1,1,1)), but that doesn't mean that an any can't match "n-all" of order > 1. My bad.
upupdate: Fantastic! Now, I actually understand the Q::S operators. Many thanks to Tilly (and also for reporting the docs bug). I really had to struggle to get used to distributing the operator joining each composite superposition across the cross-products (or something like that!). Then, everything clicked (here's to hoping it stays clicked). Q::S is really a neat package, IMHO, but a bit of a mind-bender initially.
,welchavw
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: Re: Nested Quantum::Superpositions
by TheDamian (Vicar) on Nov 07, 2003 at 21:07 UTC | |
by zby (Vicar) on Nov 10, 2003 at 11:38 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Nov 10, 2003 at 15:40 UTC | |
Re: Re: Re: Nested Quantum::Superpositions
by tilly (Archbishop) on Nov 07, 2003 at 15:19 UTC |