in reply to Re: Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array
in thread Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array
No need to reference-dereference: see the last suggestion in Re^3: Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array. If only I had thought of it earlier... well, it has been extremely interesing to learn that the =()= trick wouldn't work with split anyway...
|
|---|
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom