Re^2: Perl ORM comparison (Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object)

in reply to Re: Perl ORM comparison (Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object)
in thread Perl ORM comparison (Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object)

With regard to single/multiple authors, I have chosen to be neutral in the comparison. This way, the reader can decide on it himself/herself.

I have taken out the second best/worst performance bit. You have a point there.

Static class metadata generation is a feauture of Rose::DB::Object only. This is distinct from dynamic run-time generation, which is present in DBIx::Class too. Rose::DB::Object lets you generate the code from the database and then save it in a static manner. It's a semi-manual process. On the other hand, the fully dynamic style (like that of DBIx::Class) is also available.

For the other points, I have updated the comparison.

Comment on Re^2: Perl ORM comparison (Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Perl ORM comparison (Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object) by phaylon (Curate) on Jul 31, 2008 at 11:16 UTC
Static class metadata generation is a feauture of Rose::DB::Object only. This is distinct from dynamic run-time generation, which is present in DBIx::Class too. Rose::DB::Object lets you generate the code from the database and then save it in a static manner. That's incorrect. DBIx-Class' Loader implementations have been able to do that for some time now. See DBIx::Class::Schema::Loaders `dump_to_dir` method. Ordinary morality is for ordinary people. -- Aleister Crowley	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Perl ORM comparison (Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class vs. Rose::DB::Object) by aulusoy (Scribe) on Jul 31, 2008 at 20:01 UTC
Thank you for the comment and the pointer. I've fixed the comparison accordingly.	[reply]

In Section Meditations