http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=750500


in reply to Re^4: Top Seven (Bad) Reasons Not To Use Modules
in thread Top Seven (Bad) Reasons Not To Use Modules

Ah, I didn't know that. (I guess I would have been better off with the module too, eh?).

And you didn't even know bears could type.

  • Comment on Re^5: Top Seven (Bad) Reasons Not To Use Modules

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Top Seven (Bad) Reasons Not To Use Modules
by JavaFan (Canon) on Mar 14, 2009 at 00:37 UTC
    Don't get me wrong. I never claimed people shouldn't use modules. I never claimed the module used in the example shouldn't be used.

    I just don't think using a module to replace a substitution consisting of a single 2 character token as the pattern is a great example of how timesaving modules can be.