swissprot assignment

faten daim has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Comment on swissprot assignment

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: swissprot assignment by marto (Cardinal) on Sep 25, 2012 at 21:26 UTC
You provide no input, show no desired output and want to skip the learning part of the exercise by asking others to do your coursework. That's not really what we do here. Show some effort, explain what problems you experienced.	[reply]
Re: swissprot assignment by erix (Prior) on Sep 26, 2012 at 06:46 UTC
Your question is very inadequate. As you do not provide input or output requirements, I will assume the input is the standard swissprot format, like for example http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P15976.txt. Such UniProt records have a computer-generated format explained here: http://www.uniprot.org/manual/ or, in one page: here: http://web.expasy.org/docs/userman.html Because it is such a strict format parsing is not too difficult, but in the absence of any output-format requirement, you'll have to figure that out by yourself.	[reply]
Re: swissprot assignment by bulk88 (Priest) on Sep 26, 2012 at 00:18 UTC
aye aye captain edit: I feel it is better to not reap HW so profs can google it up. What do others in the monastery think?	[reply]
Re^2: swissprot assignment by Argel (Prior) on Sep 26, 2012 at 16:26 UTC
Looking at this thread, the most enlightening post is that the OP is most likely referencing interview question. Is this thread really worth keeping for that, especially given the trolling near the top? It's good of you to think of the hypothetical prof, but what's best for The Monastery should come first, and I am not seeing the benefit. But good question!! Elda Taluta; Sarks Sark; Ark Arks My deviantART gallery	[reply]
Re^3: swissprot assignment (worth) by tye (Sage) on Sep 26, 2012 at 17:58 UTC
Is this thread really worth keeping That's the wrong question. A thread doesn't need to justify its worth in being kept. We should not remove a node merely because a few people fail to see any significant value in it. Not only is that just putting the onus on the wrong side of the equation for philosophical reasons, it also just leads to bad decision making. When that has happened in the past, there usually appear several people who saw the value and the node got restored. Somebody has to justify the (at least somewhat compelling) reason for its removal. Which is why considering a node with the reason of just "reap" is against documented practices for the use of "consideration". - tye	[reply]
Re^4: swissprot assignment (worth) by Argel (Prior) on Sep 26, 2012 at 20:16 UTC
Re^5: swissprot assignment (effort) by tye (Sage) on Sep 26, 2012 at 21:36 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^3: swissprot assignment by Jenda (Abbot) on Sep 26, 2012 at 23:35 UTC
I do believe keeping trail of a rather badly executed attempt to cheat is best for The Monastery. I do hope the attempt is found by the interviewer, the culprit is treated accordingly and either eventually gets removed from the pool of (Perl) developers or is forced to learn what he or she is claiming he/she already knows. And it's even possible that a member of Monastery that did not lie in the CV as much as faten daim will get a chance at the interview and get the job instead. Jenda Enoch was right! Enjoy the last years of Rome.	[reply]
Re^2: swissprot assignment by Anonymous Monk on Sep 26, 2012 at 02:14 UTC
aye aye captain edit: I feel it is better to not reap HW so profs can google it up. What do others in the monastery think? This assumes it was actual homework -- highly doubtful	[reply]
Re^3: swissprot assignment by pemungkah (Priest) on Sep 26, 2012 at 03:28 UTC
Might be interview material as well. It is the first hit for swissprot_output.html, interestingly enough.	[reply]
Re: swissprot assignment by nemesdani (Friar) on Sep 25, 2012 at 20:55 UTC
I'm beginning to understand JavaFan I'm too lazy to be proud of being impatient.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^2: swissprot assignment by Anonymous Monk on Sep 25, 2012 at 20:58 UTC
What are you beginning to understand? What an odd thing to say	[reply]
Re^3: swissprot assignment by frozenwithjoy (Priest) on Sep 26, 2012 at 00:06 UTC
... some sunny day.	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re: swissprot assignment by frozenwithjoy (Priest) on Sep 26, 2012 at 00:08 UTC
Yes, sir! I'll get right on that.	[reply]

Back to Seekers of Perl Wisdom