http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=1023017


in reply to Re^3: Threads and signals in Windows (invoking the name)
in thread Threads and signals in Windows

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Threads and signals in Windows (invoking the name)
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Mar 12, 2013 at 21:15 UTC

    After all my carefully constructed, reasoned arguments about the technical merits of your posts; all you are worried about is the downvotes.

    And a liar to boot.


    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
Re^5: Threads and signals in Windows (invoking the name)
by eyepopslikeamosquito (Archbishop) on Mar 12, 2013 at 19:11 UTC

    I don’t down-vote anyone
    From Re: Meet Slang!
    Humble Monks, I just spent half of my “dog votes” today voting-down this entire thread

Re^5: Threads and signals in Windows (invoking the title)
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 12, 2013 at 23:58 UTC

    Good sir, you have a problem with me. Your almost-reflexive by-now response to me is to vilify me and to down-vote my comments. ...

    Lets see, you responded to your own node, and you're trying to play the gentleman victim?

    Do you really downvote yourself reflexively?

    you are no "good sir"