in reply to Re^2: The current state of Perl6
in thread The current state of Perl6
Depends on your definition of "production ready", but I would not yet use it in any mission critical applications. And with Perl 5.12 now out, I do not yet see a pressing reason to switch to Perl 6 yet.
CountZero
A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^4: The current state of Perl6
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 19, 2010 at 10:41 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 19, 2010 at 10:48 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 19, 2010 at 14:49 UTC | |
by CountZero (Bishop) on Apr 19, 2010 at 17:55 UTC | |
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Apr 19, 2010 at 16:39 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 19, 2010 at 16:57 UTC | |
| |
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 19, 2010 at 15:57 UTC | |
|
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom