http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=891998


in reply to Re^4: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing
in thread Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
  • Comment on Re^5: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 11, 2011 at 08:56 UTC
    Then you need to prefix all your statements with I assert/assume, so everybody knows, and can ignore
Re^6: Putting Perl Back on Top in the Fields of Scientific and Financial Computing
by mr_mischief (Monsignor) on Mar 11, 2011 at 08:37 UTC
    So your time is more valuable than that of someone else? Who are you, Hillary Clinton? Hu Jintao? Gordon Brown? Stephen Hawking? Mahmud Gebril? What are you doing for the world that punkish isn't? How would you know? Such arrogance you show. For shame...
      oh c'mon don't exhagerate. I'm just busy at the moment. I would normally have done some benchmarks but I don't have my environment with me, I'm not home and I have very little free time which I use browsing Perlmonks to see what's up with Perl these days