Re^2: Module provides both of functional interface and object-oriented one

in reply to Re: Module provides both of functional interface and object-oriented one
in thread Module provides both of functional interface and object-oriented one

Thanks for your suggestion. I feel it's modern to use Moose. Actually, I want to use my module in CGI environment, and so I think it's heavy to load Moose. In addition, I'm a Perl beginner. I want to know how to implement above features in an old-fashioned way.

Comment on Re^2: Module provides both of functional interface and object-oriented one

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Module provides both of functional interface and object-oriented one by tobyink (Canon) on Feb 17, 2012 at 09:01 UTC
There are light-weight alternatives to Moose, which use very similar syntax, making it easy to upgrade/downgrade as needed. From heaviest to lightest, there's Moose (of course), Mouse, Moo and Mo. The lightest-weight (Mo) should have enough features to implement the suggestion here - Re: Module provides both of functional interface and object-oriented one.	[reply]
Re^4: Module provides both of functional interface and object-oriented one by anazawa (Scribe) on Feb 17, 2012 at 09:13 UTC
Thanks for your comment. I didn't know what Mo is. I can't decide whether to use Moose because I have never used :) I have to learn, anyway.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom