http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=997461


in reply to Re^2: Efficiency of map vs. more verbose basic/fundamental code
in thread Efficiency of map vs. more verbose basic/fundamental code

Still, I'm having trouble seeing why turning a standard for loop into a statement modifier cuts down on the memory usage.

I didn't suggest it did.

Only that it reduced the memory requirement compared to the map variant; and sourcecode/mindspace compared to the standard for loop.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

RIP Neil Armstrong

  • Comment on Re^3: Efficiency of map vs. more verbose basic/fundamental code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Efficiency of map vs. more verbose basic/fundamental code
by aaron_baugher (Curate) on Oct 05, 2012 at 16:18 UTC

    Ah, my misunderstanding, I see that you didn't suggest what I was assuming. I agree; the statement modifier form uses less mindspace for me too.

    Aaron B.
    Available for small or large Perl jobs; see my home node.