Sometimes, change is good. But for something as entrenched as fundamental Perl regular expression syntax, that change has to be really good.

Even if we were inventing regular expressions in a vacuum with no existing code out there (which we most certainly are not. I wonder what point size it would take to stretch all of the capture brackets in current production code, end-to-end, to the moon...), I'm not convinced. I type (?:) a lot less often than I type (), so I believe the shorter code should support the more common case, as has been a long-standing design tenet of Perl.


In reply to Re: Capturing parenthesis and grouping square brackets by rjt
in thread Capturing parenthesis and grouping square brackets by Eily

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.