<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="972639" title="Re^4: Convincing Module::Install to put stuff in inc/ (zilla--)" created="2012-05-26 14:58:27" updated="2012-05-26 14:58:27">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="1382">
chromatic</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
&lt;p&gt;I find dzil to be a huge help when I code, so much that the lack of dzil on some of my older CPAN modules makes me not want to work on them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With that said, I'm very sympathetic to the experience of trying to patch a dzil-using module; it can be a real hassle to reach that point. Would it help if the &lt;em&gt;README&lt;/em&gt; or some piece of documentation somewhere (if not &lt;em&gt;README&lt;/em&gt;, then what?) said that it's okay to use &lt;c&gt;prove&lt;/c&gt; to run the tests, and that any patches can safely ignore dzil if you don't want to use it?&lt;/p&gt;</field>
<field name="root_node">
972557</field>
<field name="parent_node">
972635</field>
</data>
</node>
