Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Neither system testing nor user acceptance testing is the repeat of unit testing (OT)

by ady (Deacon)
on Oct 24, 2005 at 05:29 UTC ( #502381=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Neither system testing nor user acceptance testing is the repeat of unit testing (OT)

A strict unit test SHOULD have caught your bug here in code coverage:
...final important step is to analyze and maximize code coverage. We recommend that you implement a dynamic coding standard requiring that all code must have 100% line coverage upon check in to source control.

but of course still with 100%CC, bugs may slip through due to the Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes (Who watches the watchmen?) problem of writing test software....

The issue of boxing/unboxing is not black/white, there is a spectrum of "grey goo" in between...

/ allan
  • Comment on Re: Neither system testing nor user acceptance testing is the repeat of unit testing (OT)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://502381]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2017-12-13 05:55 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    What programming language do you hate the most?




















    Results (345 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?