Re^7: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references (op order)

That is not an optimisation.

Who said anything about optimisation?

It would also prevent the bug from manifesting itself.

What bug?

If the sequences were:

Sure, but that's not what the OP wrote.

Or are you suggesting that making a copy of the non-last operand of every operator is somehow a good idea?

Comment on Re^7: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references (op order)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references (op order) by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Mar 08, 2012 at 02:41 UTC
Or are you suggesting that making a copy of the non-last operand of every operator is somehow a good idea? Sorry, but that makes no sense in relation to what I posted. I'm not going to explain it again, so either re-read it more carefully, or just forget it. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. The start of some sanity?	[reply]
Re^9: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references (op order) by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 09, 2012 at 01:30 UTC
Sorry, but that makes no sense in relation to what I posted. That's why I asked what you considered to be a bug. My guess: The lack of copying by operators causes other operators to behave differently than you'd expect. If you deliberately hide information, you only have yourself to blame for any ensuing confusion.	[reply]
Re^10: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references (op order) by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Mar 09, 2012 at 02:04 UTC
Again. Nothing in your post bears any relation upon what I posted. (Your doing this a lot lately?) You might just as well have posted: "The french dog lick mustard blue sky cheese". It would make just as much sense. Read the damn post! Then reply in whole, complete, relevant, joined up sentences. And I hid nothing. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. The start of some sanity?	[reply]
Re^11: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references (op order) by Anonymous Monk on Mar 09, 2012 at 02:30 UTC
Re^11: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references (op order) by ikegami (Patriarch) on Mar 09, 2012 at 02:36 UTC
Re^12: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references (op order) by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Mar 09, 2012 at 02:44 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks