http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=1018125


in reply to Re: Redefining Imported Subs: of scope and no
in thread Redefining Imported Subs: of scope and no

> ... merely controls whether the compiler recognises it or not. (It always recognises CORE::say, though.)

Not always, at least for me, with which version did you check?

lanx@nc10-ubuntu:~$ perl -e 'CORE::say("bla")' CORE::say is not a keyword at -e line 1. lanx@nc10-ubuntu:~$ perl -E 'CORE::say("bla")' bla lanx@nc10-ubuntu:~$ perl -version This is perl, v5.10.0 built for i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi

> say is an operator, and use feature say; merely ...

As a minor nitpick, according to the definitions in perlglossary I'd rather use built-in and not operator to describe say, though the differences are indeed fuzzy.

Cheers Rolf

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Redefining Imported Subs: of scope and no
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Feb 11, 2013 at 21:34 UTC

    Not always, at least for me, with which version did you check?

    It apparently went missing until 5.16.

    As a minor nitpick, according to the definitions in perlglossary I'd rather use built-in and not operator to describe say, though the differences are indeed fuzzy.

    Builtin functions are a slight superset of what both perlop and perlfunc call list operators and named unary operators. say is a builtin because say is a list operator. (It's fuzzy which builtins aren't operators.)