Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Super Search

( #3989=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


Found 50 nodes roughly between 2018-01-21 and 2017-04-01 (searched 1.73% of DB).


where title contains "\"

Date:Author/owner:Title:Node type:
2017-11-23 ikegami Re^2: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-23 LanX Re^10: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? -- good habits Re:SoPW
2017-11-23 Your Mother Re^9: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? -- good habits Re:SoPW
2017-11-23 LanX Re^8: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? -- good habits Re:SoPW
2017-11-23 Your Mother Re^7: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? -- good habits Re:SoPW
2017-11-23 LanX Re^6: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? -- good habits Re:SoPW
2017-11-23 ikegami Re^6: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" ruffle feathers? Re:SoPW
2017-11-23 LanX Re^5: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? -- good habits Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 Your Mother Re^4: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 sundialsvc4 Re^3: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 Your Mother Re^2: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 sundialsvc4 Re: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 Anonymous Monk Re^4: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 Your Mother Re^3: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 Anonymous Monk Re^2: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 Your Mother Re^5: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" ruffle feathers? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 Your Mother Re^5: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 ikegami Re^4: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 Your Mother Re^5: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? -- good habits Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 Discipulus Re^4: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? -- good habits Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 Your Mother Re^3: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 ikegami Re^2: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 Your Mother Re: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 haukex Re: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 LanX Re: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 Anonymous Monk Re: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? Re:SoPW
2017-11-22 daxim Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? SoPW
2017-10-29 IB2017 Re^3: Calling subroutine with \& and passing variables Re:SoPW
2017-10-29 LanX Re^3: Calling subroutine with \& and passing variables Re:SoPW
2017-10-28 IB2017 Re^2: Calling subrutine with \& and passing variables Re:SoPW
2017-10-28 IB2017 Re^2: Calling subroutine with \& and passing variables Re:SoPW
2017-10-28 Discipulus Re: Calling subroutine with \& and passing variables Re:SoPW
2017-10-28 LanX Re: Calling subrutine with \& and passing variables Re:SoPW
2017-10-28 IB2017 Calling subrutine with \& and passing variables SoPW
2017-05-24 Arik123 Re^4: \b in Unicode regex Re:SoPW
2017-05-24 kcott Re^3: \b in Unicode regex Re:SoPW
2017-05-23 ikegami Re^4: \b in Unicode regex Re:SoPW
2017-05-23 Arik123 Re^2: \b in Unicode regex Re:SoPW
2017-05-23 Anonymous Monk Re^3: \b in Unicode regex Re:SoPW
2017-05-23 kcott Re: \b in Unicode regex Re:SoPW
2017-05-22 kennethk Re: \b in Unicode regex Re:SoPW
2017-05-22 shmem Re^3: \b in Unicode regex Re:SoPW
2017-05-22 choroba Re^3: \b in Unicode regex Re:SoPW
2017-05-22 Arik123 Re^2: \b in Unicode regex Re:SoPW
2017-05-22 shmem Re: \b in Unicode regex Re:SoPW
2017-05-22 Arik123 \b in Unicode regex SoPW
2017-04-01 BrowserUk Re: When does IPC::Open\d work on Windows, and when doesn't? Re:SoPW
2017-04-01 vr Re^2: When does IPC::Open\d work on Windows, and when doesn't? Re:SoPW
2017-04-01 haukex Re: When does IPC::Open\d work on Windows, and when doesn't? Re:SoPW
2017-04-01 vr When does IPC::Open\d work on Windows, and when doesn't? SoPW

Press to continue searching remaining 98.27% of DB.
Please be patient after submitting your search.


Reset search form

Match text containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)
titles against above.

New Please be patient after submitting your search.

Match titles containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)

authors
(use "[one] [two]" to list multiple authors)
(Searching by author doesn't work for Categorized Questions and Answers yet.)

Search ,
starting at - - .

Search
the following sections:

Skip text containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)
(Does not exclude based on titles)

Skip titles containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)






parent node's author
(use "[one] [two]" to list multiple authors)
(This doesn't work for Categorized Questions and Answers yet.)

New Please be patient after submitting your search.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Chatterbox?
[karlgoethebier]: ... a happy Sunday Roast...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (4)
As of 2018-01-21 09:57 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?










    Results (227 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?