Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

Perl Monks Discussion

( #1040=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

This section is only for discussing issues pertaining to the PerlMonks web site. You can ask about how things work, or offer ideas on how the site could be improved, for example.

Unless the topic pertains to the PerlMonks web site, it does not belong in this section. If you're unsure, check out Where should I post X? and The Perl Monks Guide to the Monastery, or ask in the chatterbox.

PerlMonks Discussions
Perl Monks Userdata leaked?
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by Skeeve
on Nov 30, 2015 at 02:33


    Is Perl Monks User Database leaked? On the 12th of November, Spam started coming to my mailbox, sent to the mail address I just use here.

    Did anyone else notice this?

Newest Nodes Settings for Anonymous Monk
1 direct reply — Read more / Contribute
by kcott
on Nov 29, 2015 at 09:07

    When logged in, Newest Nodes starts with

    Show nodes created ... More Newest Nodes Settings

    and this all works as expected.

    However, when not logged in (i.e. as Anonymous Monk), the same is displayed but the Newest Nodes Settings link does not link to Newest Nodes Settings; instead, it links to a Super Search page showing:

    Found 0 nodes ... where title contains all of "Newest", "Nodes", "Settings"

    I don't know what the intended functionality is but I suspect this isn't it.

    Here's a non-exhaustive list of possibilities for Anonymous Monk:

    • Remove the "More Newest Nodes Settings" part.
    • Provide a link to a node allowing limited settings changes, e.g. order of nodes (oldest instead of best first), depth of nodes ("Re^5: ..." seems to be the default), etc.
    • Change wording so that it's clear this is a search, not a settings change.

    I'm not making a request for any of those specifically nor do I have any particular preference. I do, however, think that the wording should match the action.

    — Ken

Moving an approved node
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by Athanasius
on Nov 22, 2015 at 22:58

    The node "Indirect" object syntax? was posted as a Question, and I approved it as such. Now (a few minutes later) I see it’s become an unapproved Meditation.

    This surprises me. On many occasions I’ve seen a Consideration requesting that an approved node be transferred to another section, so I assumed that a node, once approved, couldn’t be transferred via the “Move to:” option in the Approval Nodelet. Was I wrong?

    I’m also surprised that moving a node should cancel its approval. Is this a bug, or is it the expected behaviour?


    Athanasius <°(((><contra mundum Iustus alius egestas vitae, eros Piratica,

Categorized Answers in RAT: broken link
No replies — Read more | Post response
by Athanasius
on Nov 20, 2015 at 23:08
voting while on superdoc SOPW(Seekers of Perl Wisdom ) doesn't preserve next=
No replies — Read more | Post response
by beech
on Nov 12, 2015 at 03:18

    voting while on superdoc SOPW(Seekers of Perl Wisdom ) doesn't preserve next=

    For example I am browsing ?next=180;node_id=479, I vote, next isn't preserved, back to the very latest nodes as if next=0

    It would be nice if the value was passed when I hit vote, and even nicer if the url was preserved

    But its a minor issue


Tough beans again?
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by BrowserUk
on Nov 10, 2015 at 14:40

    Is it the season? Or perhaps the end of the season? Cos, we (or I?) am suddenly getting "Tough beans" again. Maybe they're getting passed their sell-by date :)

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :)
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[kobes:// shortcut
5 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by ambrus
on Nov 03, 2015 at 16:53

    The [kobes://foo] and [kobes://foo] link shortcut used to point to a certain CPAN search server. It appears in hundreds of nodes. Those links are now broken. [kobes://XML::Twig] points to a Not Found page, and [kobes://] points to the webpage of Archimedes Math Schools. (Luckily, the argumentless form is barely used.) What should we do with these links, and their documentation? Leave broken as is and document that it's broken, leave broken except the argumentless form, redirect to some other CPAN search server, render as non-linked text, remove the shortcut, link to a faqlet explaining that that search server is gone?

RAT trouble (day missing from the calendar)
1 direct reply — Read more / Contribute
by ambrus
on Nov 02, 2015 at 15:57
My thread dissappeared
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by Todd Chester
on Oct 17, 2015 at 02:09

    My posting at

    suddenly is not showing the latest replies, including my own. Is there a page 2 or some such? What the heck???

    Never mind. I got my thread mixed up with someone else's. This site is very difficult to use

Add "is this username available" instructions to "Choosing a username" page in PM FAQ
4 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by GotToBTru
on Oct 13, 2015 at 14:28

    I suggest adding instructions in using SuperSearch to determine if a username is available to Choosing a username

    Is my username available?

    Here is how to determine if someone already has that name. This will not determine if a username is allowed; make sure you read the "Restrictions" section of this page to determine that.

  • Go to Perl Monks User Search.
  • Fill in your desired username in the "Author" box.
  • Click on the Search button. Wait patiently.
  • If the results are

    It seems that "desired username" does not exist. How very, very strange...

    congratulations! That name is available.

    Updated: shorter version using specific search page

    Dum Spiro Spero
Cached(?) pages when not-logged-in sometimes appear to be very seriously out-of-date
6 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by sundialsvc4
on Oct 12, 2015 at 17:13

    FYI ... when I stumble-upon certain mainline sections, such as Meditations or Perl Monks Discussion, ... and for some (but not all?) threads listed on those pages ... I lately observe that the content is often many days(!) out-of-date ... until I log in.

    I think that this problem varies from one major-topic to another ... e.g. Seekers vs. Meditations vs. PMD.)   Specifically, I think that I am seeing “cache artifacts” that seem to vary(!) between “headline” pages and “particular threads” within a topic ... but, not necessarily consistently.   Sometimes I think that I am seeing a “fresh” page, while sometimes I think that a “neighboring” page is, in fact, “very stale.”   (I generally suspect that “the headline page” is the one, of the two, that is “very stale.”)   Given that I dump my local browser cache many times a day, I do not believe that local-caching is the root cause of this problem.

How can one find his previous preview page (uncreated)?
3 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by u65
on Oct 03, 2015 at 11:48

    Is there a procedure for finding an uncreated preview node?

    A couple of times now I've started a post but got interrupted before I pushed "create" and so far have found no reliable way to easily find what I started. If I don't go too far astray, I can keep pushing the back arrow in my browser and find it, but if I log off or otherwise close the page I can't always find it again. I have not been able to find much searching about preview here except the threads on wanting a preview capability for updates.

    Note that when working on longer posts I've kept text in an offline file to edit and copy from, but that seems to be a pain for relatively small posts, but I guess I could make that a habit.


here frequency ?
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by LanX
on Sep 26, 2015 at 10:03

    Just an idea...

    Would it make sense to add a "here frequency" to the user profiles?

    I just spotted a good brother who wasn't here for a long time but he disappeared before my /msg could reach him.

    Strangely I can't tell if he's passing now more frequently b/c last here is only telling me what I already know.

    More a meditation...

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
    Je suis Charlie!

Bug in RAT node display?
1 direct reply — Read more / Contribute
by Athanasius
on Aug 30, 2015 at 09:00

    I just considered Digest::MD5 addfile() w/ tied filehandle to fix a spelling mistake in the name of the module under discussion. The node was already approved and front-paged. Following the consideration, the node is marked (CA) in Recently Active Threads (Full Thread view). Before consideration, it was marked (FA). So, the F (for Front Page) has now dropped out, although the node is still on the Front Page.

    Nothing earth-shaking here, I know, but — is this the expected behaviour, or is it a bug? I expected the node to be displayed with (CFA) following the consideration.


    Athanasius <°(((><contra mundum Iustus alius egestas vitae, eros Piratica,

Reaped nodes no longer visible?
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by Athanasius
on Aug 10, 2015 at 03:33

    Has there been a change to the display of reaped nodes?

    In looking through a thread, I used to see nodes that were marked as “reaped.” The content of these nodes wasn’t visible, but there was a link to see that content if one wanted to. Now, threads I know to contain reaped nodes no longer show them at all.

    This used to be configurable via one of the user settings. So my thought was that my setting had somehow been changed from “show reaped nodes” to “don’t show reaped nodes” — but now I can’t even find that setting anywhere.

    So, am I imagining things, or has the site been changed to no longer show reaped nodes? I see they are still accessible via the homepage of he who must not be named, just not in the threads where they were posted.

    Don’t get me wrong, if this change has been made then I’m all for it. I’ve long thought it was counter-intuitive to mark a node as “reaped” and yet still make it (relatively) easy to see what it said. I’m just surprised that no announcement has been made in Tidings (and a Super Search on “reaped nodes” shed no light on the issue).


    Athanasius <°(((><contra mundum Iustus alius egestas vitae, eros Piratica,

Discussion Item
Give us your input:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (14)
    As of 2015-12-01 18:05 GMT
    Find Nodes?
      Voting Booth?

      My keyboard shows this many letters:

      Results (24 votes), past polls