Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Super Search

( #3989=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


Found 50 nodes roughly between 2017-09-25 and 2015-08-15 (searched 5.11% of DB).


where title contains "Test::More"

Date:Author/owner:Title:Node type:
2017-09-10 perl4life Re^2: Print summary of tests results when using Test::More ? Re:SoPW
2017-09-10 haukex Re: Print summary of tests results when using Test::More ? Re:SoPW
2017-09-10 1nickt Re: Print summary of tests results when using Test::More ? Re:SoPW
2017-09-10 choroba Re: Print summary of tests results when using Test::More ? Re:SoPW
2017-09-10 perl4life Print summary of tests results when using Test::More ? SoPW
2017-07-04 haukex Re: Quieting Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-07-04 kcott Re: Quieting Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-07-03 1nickt Re: Quieting Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-07-03 stevieb Re^2: Quieting Test::More (purpose, diag) Re:SoPW
2017-07-03 stevieb Re^2: Quieting Test::More (purpose, diag) Re:SoPW
2017-07-03 Anonymous Monk Re: Quieting Test::More (purpose, diag) Re:SoPW
2017-07-03 stevieb Re^2: Quieting Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-07-03 Anonymous Monk Re: Quieting Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-07-03 stevieb Quieting Test::More SoPW
2017-06-08 frazap Re^2: Test::More file not found on unix Re:SoPW
2017-06-02 haukex Re: Test::More file not found on unix (updated) Re:SoPW
2017-06-02 stevieb Re: Test::More file not found on unix Re:SoPW
2017-06-02 Anonymous Monk Re: Test::More file not found on unix Re:SoPW
2017-06-02 frazap Test::More file not found on unix SoPW
2017-03-05 haukex Re^3: A way to suppress output of passed tests in a subtest with Test::More? Re:SoPW
2017-03-02 Anonymous Monk Re^3: A way to suppress output of passed tests in a subtest with Test::More? Re:SoPW
2017-03-02 nysus Re^2: A way to suppress output of passed tests in a subtest with Test::More? Re:SoPW
2017-03-02 nysus Re^2: A way to suppress output of passed tests in a subtest with Test::More? Re:SoPW
2017-03-02 haukex Re: A way to suppress output of passed tests in a subtest with Test::More? Re:SoPW
2017-03-02 nysus A way to suppress output of passed tests in a subtest with Test::More? SoPW
2017-01-13 1nickt Re^7: debug output from TODO with Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-01-13 Anonymous Monk Re^6: debug output from TODO with Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-01-13 1nickt Re^5: debug output from TODO with Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-01-13 Anonymous Monk Re^3: debug output from TODO with Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-01-13 Anonymous Monk Re^4: debug output from TODO with Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-01-13 haukex Re^2: debug output from TODO with Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-01-13 haukex Re^3: debug output from TODO with Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-01-13 Anonymous Monk Re^2: debug output from TODO with Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-01-13 haukex Re: debug output from TODO with Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-01-13 Anonymous Monk Re: debug output from TODO with Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-01-13 stevieb Re^3: debug output from TODO with Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-01-13 1nickt Re^2: debug output from TODO with Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-01-13 stevieb Re: debug output from TODO with Test::More Re:SoPW
2017-01-13 1nickt debug output from TODO with Test::More SoPW
2017-01-08 LanX Re: Test::More continue after failure Re:SoPW
2017-01-08 Anonymous Monk Test::More continue after failure SoPW
2016-02-08 Anonymous Monk Re^2: How to ask better questions using Test::More and sample data Re:Med
2016-02-08 stevieb Re: How to ask better questions using Test::More and sample data Re:Med
2016-02-08 neilwatson How to ask better questions using Test::More and sample data Med
2015-08-28 1nickt Re: getting is_deeply test::more to print to log ( Test::More->builder->failure_output ) Re:SoPW
2015-08-28 vinoth.ree Re: getting is_deeply test::more to print to log Re:SoPW
2015-08-28 teamassociated getting is_deeply test::more to print to log SoPW
2015-08-17 thargas Re^5: Is there an is_deeply() outside of Test::More? Re:SoPW
2015-08-15 stevieb Re^4: Is there an is_deeply() outside of Test::More? Re:SoPW
2015-08-15 afoken Re^3: Is there an is_deeply() outside of Test::More? Re:SoPW

Press to continue searching remaining 94.89% of DB.
Please be patient after submitting your search.


Reset search form

Match text containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)
titles against above.

New Please be patient after submitting your search.

Match titles containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)

authors
(use "[one] [two]" to list multiple authors)
(Searching by author doesn't work for Categorized Questions and Answers yet.)

Search ,
starting at - - .

Search
the following sections:

Skip text containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)
(Does not exclude based on titles)

Skip titles containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)






parent node's author
(use "[one] [two]" to list multiple authors)
(This doesn't work for Categorized Questions and Answers yet.)

New Please be patient after submitting your search.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Chatterbox?
[erix]: then you might as well send that patch to the DBIC guys :)
[Corion]: erix: Yeah, I just found that it has no documentation at all on how to circumvent/ eliminate "1+n SELECTs" by building a local hash... I guess I have to make ->has_many do the hash lookup instead of doing the SQL query. But as the problem ...
[Corion]: ... has only manifested itself so far through the puzzled questions of other bystanders, I won't go deeper at this time. But the DBIx::Class documentation could well do with a document on how to make "it" (that is, ORMs in general) faster ;)
[Corion]: I find that DBIx::Class, like most ORMs makes things easy until they become performance critical and then makes it horribly hard to change things because the design is highly inflexible if you don't already know about the problems of 1+n :-/
[choroba]: that's why I don't like similar libraries. They pretend you don't have to learn SQL, but in the end, you have to learn how SQL plus to overcome their own limitations
[Corion]: "Just write the proper SQL beforehand" is of course the appropriate solution, but if you did that, you wouldn't/couldn't use DBIx::Class either. At least not in an obvious (to me) way.
choroba scratches a "how"
[Corion]: choroba: Exactly... But maybe that's just because I'm old and grumpy ;)
[Corion]: But maybe that could also be a nice talk, how to restructure your DBIx::Class-based app to remove 1+n-style query patterns

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (6)
As of 2017-09-25 11:09 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    During the recent solar eclipse, I:









    Results (279 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?