in reply to Re^7: raw data formattingin thread raw data formatting
I don't know that you're correct about "posting the real data again". The re-posted data contained text like "ADAMS ,xxxxxxx," so it clearly appeared that all sensitive info had been redacted--after I requested that it be scrubbed.
Have removed all data, just in case...
Indeed. I thought you did, in fact, scrub the data before I worked on it and then re-posted it (hence the "ADAMS ,xxxxxxx" in the data). Have removed it anyway...
.desrever si txet eritne ehT
.backwards are (letters the not but) words the Only
ehT sdrow era ni redro, tub eht srettel era eht rehto yaw.
Who ndees baacdkrws wehn you have Tceilmopgyya?
?wdors reeersvd up meixd about How
.tusnnmihep rof nuttolg a m'I
Results (441 votes). Check out past polls.