Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

Re: Regex to compare (if) two strings (Uniquely - I will explain inside)

by AnomalousMonk (Monsignor)
on Nov 25, 2012 at 11:53 UTC ( #1005478=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Regex to compare (if) two strings (Uniquely - I will explain inside)

In a similar vein to this, another regex approach. I hesitate to offer it because I'm not sure the increased complexity pays off. More effort is spent in building the thing, but despite being significantly larger, the final regex may run more quickly versus the repeated compilation and invocation of the shorter  s/// of the previous link. However, it may take operation on rather long strings for any advantage to become manifest. I have done no benchmarking, but at least it's tested and works. The dreams of regexen produce monsters.

sub scrabblicious { my ($word, # word to test for proper match to tray of letters $tray, # string with 'tray' of letters to select from ) = @_; return unless # handles word empty string (my $rx = join '', sort split '', $word) =~ s{ (.) \1* } { $+[0] - $-[0] > 1 ? qq/(?= (?: .*? \Q$1\E){@{[ $+[0] - $-[0] ]}})/ : qq/(?= .*? \Q$1\E)/ }xmseg; return $tray =~ m{ \A $rx }xms; }

Comment on Re: Regex to compare (if) two strings (Uniquely - I will explain inside)
Select or Download Code

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1005478]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-07-25 07:57 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:

    Results (169 votes), past polls