Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: new keyword "size" to avoid scalar trap ? ( scalar @array != scalar(LIST) )

by Laurent_R (Monsignor)
on Dec 08, 2012 at 15:46 UTC ( #1007899=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: new keyword "size" to avoid scalar trap ? ( scalar @array != scalar(LIST) )
in thread new keyword "size" to avoid scalar trap ? ( scalar @array != scalar(LIST) )

It is most probably the copying of the argument list (the full array) in the function call that takes this time difference.

Passing a reference to the array would probably solve the issue, but the syntax would become less obvious to use.


Comment on Re^3: new keyword "size" to avoid scalar trap ? ( scalar @array != scalar(LIST) )
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: new keyword "size" to avoid scalar trap ? ( scalar @array != scalar(LIST) )
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 08, 2012 at 16:02 UTC
    No copying takes place :) however the same amount of scalars is aliased ;)
Re^4: new keyword "size" to avoid scalar trap ? ( scalar @array != scalar(LIST) )
by LanX (Canon) on Dec 08, 2012 at 17:34 UTC
    Thats why we need prototypes or a special C-implementaton.

    according to the perlsub sub size (+;@) { } could be used, to call

     size @array

    or

     size 1,2,3

    but since I'm using 5.10, I can't test it...

    Cheers Rolf

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1007899]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (12)
As of 2015-07-28 19:09 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (258 votes), past polls